Next generation Molecular tools for tracking Harmful algal bloom and Microbial sources
Author Affiliations
- 1Department of Post-Graduate Studies in Zoology, Nrupathunga University, Bengaluru, India
- 2Department of Post-Graduate Studies in Zoology, Nrupathunga University, Bengaluru, India
- 3Department of Post-Graduate Studies in Zoology, Nrupathunga University, Bengaluru, India
- 4Department of Post-Graduate Studies in Zoology, Nrupathunga University, Bengaluru, India
Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 15, Issue (3), Pages 61-67, July,2 (2026)
Abstract
In the recent decade’s escalated anthropogenic pressure and climatic change has led to severe destruction of ecosystem along with the formation of harmful algal blooms. Substantial implications of these harmful algal blooms which constitute one of the major threats to aquatic ecosystem include considerable impact on ecological balance, aquatic biodiversity, human health and blue economy. In order to monitor, detect and mitigate the effects of harmful algal blooms, emphasis has to be given for early detection using molecular tools. In the present study water quality parameters analyzed from different lakes establish a clear link between environmental conditions and quality as well as quantity of living beings present. Highest colony counts reflected on nutrient media were in consistent with the eutrophic conditions. Prevalence of gram negative bacteria, in Lakes B and D were due to their ability to degrade organic matter, contributing to bloom dynamics. Sequencing of purified PCR products from cultured isolates identified dominant genera, Pseudomonas, Vibrio, Aeromonas and Bacillus in Lakes B and D. it is in alignment with the highest read counts in metagenomic analysis. Higher GC content in Lakes B and D is likely due to the dominance of cyanobacteria. Microcystin biosynthesis genes (mcy gene) were most abundant in Lakes B and D correlating with Microcystis abundance.
References
- Durham, W. M., & Stocker, R. (2012)., Thin phytoplankton layers: characteristics, mechanisms, and consequences., Annual review of marine science, 4, 177-207.
- Behrenfeld, M. J., & Boss, E. S. (2014)., Resurrecting the ecological underpinnings of ocean plankton blooms., Annual review of marine science, 6(1), 167-194.
- Beardall, J., Ihnken, S., & Quigg, A. (2009)., Gross and net primary production: closing the gap between concepts and measurements., Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 56, 113-122.
- Nayak, A. R., Kolluru, S., Kumar, A., & Bhadury, P. (2025)., Revisiting harmful algal blooms in India through a global lens: An integrated framework for enhanced research and monitoring., Iscience, 28(2).
- Hallegraeff, G., Enevoldsen, H., & Zingone, A. (2021)., Global harmful algal bloom status reporting., Harmful Algae, 102, 101992.
- Masoomi, S. R., Ganji, M, Annuk A., Mahmood A., Eftekhari, M., Gheibi, M. and Moezzi R. (2026)., Harmful Algal Blooms as Emerging Marine Pollutants: A Review of Monitoring, Risk Assessment, and Management with a Mexican Case Study., Pollutants, 6(4).
- Feng, L.; Wang, Y.; Hou, X.; Qin, B.; Kutser, T.; Qu, F.; Chen, N.; Paerl, H.W.; Zheng, C. (2024)., Harmful Algal Blooms in Inland Waters., Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 5, 631–644.
- Huang, H., Xu, Q., Gibson, K., Chen, Y., & Chen, N. (2021)., Molecular characterization of harmful algal blooms in the Bohai Sea using metabarcoding analysis., Harmful Algae, 106, 102066.
- Diaz, M. R., Jacobson, J. W., Goodwin, K.D., Dunbar, S.A., and Fell, J.W. (2010)., Molecular detection of harmful algal blooms (HABs) using locked nucleic acids and bead array technology., Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods, 8, 269–284.
- Perini, F., Bastianini, M., Capellacci, S., Pugliese, L., DiPoi, E., Cabrini, M., ... & Penna, A. (2019)., Molecular methods for cost-efficient monitoring of HAB (harmful algal bloom) dinoflagellate resting cysts., Marine pollution bulletin, 147, 209-218.
- Smith, K.F., Stuart, J., and Rhodes, L.L. (2024)., Molecular approaches and challenges for monitoring marine harmful algal blooms in a changing world., Front. Protistol. 1, 1305634.
