International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN. 

Impact of Goods and Services tax on Micro, Small and Medium enterprises in Karnatka, India

Author Affiliations

  • 1KRCES GGD ARTS, BMP Commerce and SVS Science College Bailhongal, Bailhongal, Karnataka, India

Res. J. Management Sci., Volume 15, Issue (2), Pages 1-5, May,6 (2026)

Abstract

The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) was aimed at establishing a unified and efficient indirect tax system in India; however, its impact on decentralized rural production systems remains inadequately examined. This study investigates the effect of GST on cost structures, pricing behaviour, and profitability of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in the rural textile sector of Karnataka. The findings reveal a significant “pincer effect,” wherein rising input costs and rigid market conditions have led to a decline in net profit margins from 12.80% to 10.15%, indicating that these enterprises function as “price takers” and are unable to shift tax burdens onto consumers. The study also highlights a substantial digital divide, where lower educational attainment and limited digital literacy increase compliance complexity and administrative costs. Furthermore, delays in Input Tax Credit (ITC) refunds contribute to persistent liquidity constraints, compelling enterprises to rely on high-interest informal credit sources. Although recent GST rationalization measures have attempted to address structural inefficiencies, their effectiveness at the grassroots level remains limited. The study concludes that while GST has enhanced formalization, it has simultaneously imposed operational challenges on rural MSMEs, thereby necessitating targeted policy interventions focusing on simplified compliance mechanisms, faster refund processes, and digital capacity enhancement for sustainable and inclusive growth.

References

  1. Aggarwal, S., & Narayanan, K. (2023)., The compliance paradox: Formalization and scale-adjustment in India’s MSME sector post-GST., Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30(4), 512–529.
  2. Bansal, R., Mehta, P., & Tiwari, S. (2024)., Liquidity traps and the working capital cycle: A post-implementation review of GST in rural textile clusters., Indian Journal of Finance, 18(2), 45–58.
  3. Government of Karnataka. (2025)., Economic Survey of Karnataka 2024–25., Finance Department, Bengaluru.
  4. Hiremath, S. B., & Patil, M. R. (2025)., Digital literacy as a socio-economic determinant of industrial survival: A study of Ilkal saree clusters., Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 38(1), 112–119.
  5. Jagetia, P. (2020)., Structural friction and tax transmission in multi-slab regimes: Evidence from the Indian powerloom sector., International Journal of Management Studies, 7(3), 88–94.
  6. Maidan, A., & Garg, V. (2019)., The inverted duty structure and its impact on the textile MSME sector: An empirical analysis., Taxation and Rural Development Quarterly, 12(4), 201–215.
  7. Mukherjee, S. (2022)., Price-taker dynamics and margin compression in the GST era: A sectoral analysis of fragmented supply chains. Journal of Rural Economics and Policy, 15(2), 77–92., undefined
  8. Pandey, A., Sharma, K., & Yadav, R. (2023). Digital dependency and compliance shocks: The administrative burden on decentralized textile producers., Journal of Indian Economic Policy, 29(1), 33–51., undefined
  9. Prakash, N., Kumar, V., & Joshi, S. (2020)., Growth, challenges, and opportunities in the Indian textile industry: A policy perspective., Textile Review India, 45(6), 12–25.
  10. Ministry of Textiles, Government of India (2024)., Annual Report 2023–24., New Delhi.
  11. GST Council. (2025), GST Rationalization Report., Government of India.
  12. Reserve Bank of India. (2024)., Report on MSME Sector Financing., Mumbai.