International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN. 

Entanglement to Enlightenment—Reappraising Quantum Paradoxes and Double Slit Experiment through Vedic Aakash

Author Affiliations

  • 1Independent Researcher and Spiritual Seeker; Surgeon, Sri Krishna Hospital, Narasaraopet, Andhra Pradesh, India

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 15, Issue (1), Pages 21-28, January,2 (2026)

Abstract

Modern physics, despite its remarkable predictive successes, grapples with profound paradoxes that have left even its pioneers bewildered. Figures like Richard Feynman and Niels Bohr openly admitted the field's inherent lack of intuitive coherence, with Feynman remarking that, "No one understands quantum mechanics" and Bohr warning that true comprehension induces vertigo. At the heart of this turmoil lies the Double-Slit Experiment (DSE), which birthed enigmatic concepts such as wave-particle duality and the observer effect—ideas that seem to infuse mysticism into empirical science. This paper proposes a resolution by resurrecting the Vedic notion of Aakash (Ether) as a singular, tangible, continuous medium: the "Ocean of Photons." Through this lens, the DSE's infamous "wave function collapse" emerges not as a probabilistic enigma dependent on consciousness, but as a straightforward mechanical perturbation induced by the detector's physical intrusion. This framework unifies disparate elements like the Higgs Field, Dark Matter, and gravity, forging a bridge between the ancient Pancha Bhutas (five elements) and contemporary physics. Moreover, it extends the DSE's wave-particle toggle to Yogic methodologies, illuminating a rational, evidence-based route to perceiving omnipresence and achieving spiritual enlightenment. By demystifying quantum paradoxes and restoring mechanical causality, this model invites a paradigm shift toward a cohesive, logic-driven understanding of reality. With assistance from Grok (xAI), a novel Lagrangian formalizes Aakash as a viscous, incompressible fluid, yielding Navier-Stokes equations that mechanize its hydrodynamic behaviors.

References

  1. Pais A. (1991)., Niels Bohr, Oxford University Press.
  2. Feynman R. P. (1965)., The Character of Physical Law., MIT Press.
  3. Adler S. L. (2003)., Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: A response to P. W. Anderson., Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34(1), 135-142.
  4. Michelson, A. A., & Morley, E. W. (1887)., On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether., American Journal of Science, 34(203), 333-345.
  5. Dobson, G. (1995)., Vishnu, Motilal Banarsidass
  6. ATLAS Collaboration & CMS Collaboration (2012)., Observations of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC., Physics Letters B, 716(1), 1-29
  7. Fresnel, A. (1818)., On the influence of the motion of the earth on the phenomena of light., Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 9, 57-66.
  8. Young, T. (1804)., Experiments and calculations relative to physical optics., Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 94, 1-16
  9. Grotz, T. (2025)., Aether (Akasha), Vedic Philosophy & Nicola Tesla., Retrieved from http://mountainman.com. au/aether_1.html November 2025
  10. Einstein, A. (1915)., Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation., Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 844-847.
  11. Taha, A., & Gonzalez, D. (2023)., Variational principles for dissipative systems: Minimum pressure gradients in Navier-Stokes., Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 952, A1.
  12. Jacobson, T., et al. (2017)., Einstein-aether theory: Dynamics of relativistic particles with spin or polarization., Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2017(04), 025.
  13. Telles, S., et al. (2020)., Yoga and brain wave coherence: A systematic review., Heart and Mind, 4(2), 45-56.