International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN. 

Regional Puppetry traditions for Social development in India and their role in Folklore preservation

    , , ,

Author Affiliations

  • 1Dept. of Journalism and Mass Communication, YS College, Barnala, Punjab, India
  • 2Dept. of Journalism and Mass Communication, YS College, Barnala, Punjab, India
  • 3YS College, Barnala, Punjab, India
  • 4Dept. of Journalism and Mass Communication, Tula’s Institute, Dehradun, India

Int. Res. J. Social Sci., Volume 14, Issue (4), Pages 9-13, October,14 (2025)

Abstract

Puppetry has been an integral part of India's rich cultural heritage, serving as both a form of entertainment and a medium for social communication. Various regional puppetry traditions, such as Kathputli of Rajasthan, Tholu Bommalata of Andhra Pradesh, Bommalattam of Tamil Nadu, and Putul Nach of West Bengal, have played a crucial role in addressing social issues, educating communities, and preserving folklore. This study explores how traditional puppetry has been utilized as a tool for social development in India, particularly in promoting literacy, health awareness, and social reform. Moreover, puppetry serves as a living archive of folklore, passing down myths, legends, and moral narratives from generation to generation. By blending storytelling, music, and visual artistry, regional puppetry forms help sustain cultural identity and reinforce moral values. However, with the rise of digital media and modern entertainment, traditional puppetry faces challenges in maintaining its relevance. This research examines the efforts being made to revitalize puppetry, including government initiatives, NGO interventions, and digital adaptations. By analyzing the role of regional puppetry traditions in both social development and folklore preservation, this study highlights the importance of sustaining these traditional art forms as powerful tools for education, cultural continuity, and community engagement.

References

  1. Baird, B. (1973)., The art of the puppet., Macmillan Publishing.
  2. Majaron, E. (2000)., Puppetry in education and therapy., UNIMA International Puppetry Journal, 4, 12–17.
  3. Pandey, A. (2017)., Puppetry as a means of communication in rural India., Journal of Rural Studies, 6(2), 45–52.
  4. Slater, M. (2012)., The power of puppetry in communication., Media and Arts Research Journal, 10(3), 89–97.
  5. Anindita, R. (2017)., Puppetry in India: A traditional art form in modern times., National Book Trust.
  6. Rangarajan, M. (2011)., Environmental education through puppetry: A case study from Andhra Pradesh., Indian Journal of Environmental Studies, 18(2), 101–108.
  7. Seltman, C. (1982)., Women and performance in Indian puppetry., Gender and Culture, 7(4), 201–213.
  8. Chattopadhyay, A. (2017)., Theatre of shadows: Indian puppetry traditions., Seagull Books.
  9. River, M. (2021)., Performing the environment: Puppetry and ecological storytelling., Performance Research, 26(5), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2021.1980229
  10. McLachlan, C., Fleer, M., & Edwards, S. (2009)., Early childhood curriculum: Planning, assessment and implementation., Cambridge University Press.
  11. Moula, Z. (2021)., Puppetry for children, British Journal of Social Work, 51(2), 600–617. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa 010
  12. Jasim, H. (2017)., The effect of storytelling on English language learners., International Journal of Humanities and Social Science.
  13. Boulton, M. (2010)., Teaching through storytelling., Teaching & Teacher Education, 26(8), 1734–1742.
  14. Simon, S., Naylor, S., Keogh, B., Maloney, J., & Downing, B. (2008)., Puppets promoting engagement and talk in science., International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1229–1248.
  15. Roshanzadeh, M., Zadeh, M. M., & Mohammadi, H. (2020)., The effect of puppetry on preoperative anxiety in children: A clinical trial., Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 51, e74–e79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2020.01.003.