International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Personnel Performance Evaluation based on Balanced Scorecard (BSC) in Iran Health Networks

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Health Services management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IRAN
  • 2 Faculty Member, Head of Economy Department, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IRAN
  • 3 Economics and Research, Economic Research Center, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IRAN

Res. J. Management Sci., Volume 4, Issue (3), Pages 1-5, March,6 (2015)


Performance appraisal is an important part of organizational life because it can serve a number of functions/purposes. Efficiency increasing is among the goals of every organizations and it depends on the development of personnel’s performance. To this objective, the personnel’s performance must be investigated and controlled in order to be improved and this can’t be done without measurement and evaluation. Therefore a system of performance evaluation is necessary for the organization. Due to the fact that performance evaluation is a difficult aspect of human resource management, a logical procedure must be designed considering the work conditions and human resource arrangement. In this research, the balanced scored card (BSC) was considered as an evaluation model and appropriate criteria of personnel’s performance appraisal were selected due to its four perspectives afterwards the weight of each criteria was achieved using Factor Analysis. For studying the research collected views of 40 experts about performance appraisal. The data collection instrument for designing the questionnaire was a 101-question questionnaire includes 39 closed questions that measured by Likert's scales, 61 ranking question by selective and one open question. This research can specify personnel performance rank and be a strategy of motivation and efficiency job promotion for each of them.


  1. Dasam R., The Financial and Human resource Management Strategies to Develop the Organization, Res. J. Management Sci., 2(10), 6-9 (2013)
  2. Hosmani A.P. and Shambhushankar, Bindurani R., Study on Impact of Quality of Work Life on Job Performance amongst Employees of Secunderabad Division of South Central Railway, Res. J. Management Sci., 3(11), 8-11 (2014)
  3. Cihan Evecen and Ahmet Bekese, A Performance Appraisal Model Proposal For Blue- Collar Employees in a University, 13th International Research/Expert Conference ”Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology” TMT 2009, Hammamet, Tunisia, 16-21 (2009)
  4. Kongala Ramprasad, Motivation and Workforce Performance in Indian industries, Res. J. Management Sci., 2(4), 25-29 (2013)
  5. Armstrong M., Human resource management practice, 8th ed., London: Kogan Page Publishers, (2001)
  6. Nadeem I., Naveed A., Zeeshan H., Yumna B. and Qurat UA., Impact of performance appraisal on employee’s performance involving the moderating role of motivation, AJBMR (OMAN Chapter), 3(1), 37-56 (2013)
  7. Grubb T., Performance appraisal reappraised: It’s not all positive, Journal of Human Resource Education, 1(1), 1-22, (2007)
  8. Najafi L., Hamidi Y., Vatankhah S. and Purnajaf A., The effect of performance appraisal results on the personnel’s motivation and job promotion, AJBAS, 4(9), 6052-6056, (2010)
  9. WEN Xin, JIA Jianfeng and ZHAO Xi’nan, Research on Evaluation Method of Organization’s Performance Based on Comparative Advantage Characteristics, BMD, 1(10), 67-72, (2012)
  10. Mohammad TH and Md. Mahmudul H., Quantification of Qualitative Parameters for Performance Appraisal: A Case Study, ASAUB, 4(2), 39-48, (2010)
  11. Yeun-Wen C., Ruey-Dang C. and Ching-Ping C., Associations between Performance Measurement Diversity and Participation Congruence in RandD Teams: The Impact on Firm Performance, APMR, 15(2), 261-279, (2010)
  12. Kaplan R. and Norton D., Using the balanced scorecard as a Strategic Management System, HBR, 75-85, (1996)
  13. Kaplan R.S. and Norton D.P., Having Trouble with Your strategy? Then Map It! HBR, (2001)
  14. Henri J.F., Organizational culture and performance measurement systems, Account ORG SOC, 31(1), 77-103, (2006)
  15. Hoque Z. and James W., Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance, JMAR, 12(1), 1-15, (2000)
  16. Adnan S. and Mohamed KY., Performance Evaluation –Methods and Techniques Survey, IJCIT, 3(5), 966-979, (2014)
  17. Kang G. and Fredin A., The balanced scorecard: The effects of feedback on performance evaluation, Management Research Review, 35(7), 637-662, (2012)
  18. Adekanbi BA. and Bayat MS., Performance management and development systems with balanced scorecard as a performance appraisal tool at a selected eastern Cape hospital – A case study approach, SJBEM, 2(5), 10-20, (2013)
  19. Chen H.F., Hou Y.H. and Chang R.E., Application of the balanced scorecard to an academic medical center in Taiwan: The effect of warning systems on improvement of hospital performance, J Chin Med Assoc, 75, 530-535, (2012)
  20. Ardekani SS., Morovati Sharifabadi A., Jalaly M. and Eghbali Zarch M., Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Using FAHP-FVIKOR Approach Based on Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A Case of Yazd's Ceramic and Tile Industry, IJMS, , 81- 104, (2013)
  21. Salehi M. and Ghorbani B., Astudy of using financial and non- financial criteria in evaluating performance: some evidence of Iran, SJM, 6(1), 97–108, (2011)
  22. Kazemi Mostafa, Rajabi Batool and Pirani Parvaneh, Identify and Ranking the Factors affecting Customer satisfaction in the carpet Industry (Case Study: Sahand Carpet Co.), Res. J. Management Sci., 2(6), 1-8 (2013)