International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN. 

Structural Grounded Modeling: An Extension of Grounded Theory Method

Author Affiliations

  • 1Marketing Management, Aras Int’l Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Res. J. Management Sci., Volume 14, Issue (1), Pages 1-7, May,6 (2024)

Abstract

Grounded Theory (GT) has been widely used in different fields of social sciences since its inception. On the other hand, the interpretive structural modeling (ISM) method has been well embraced by researchers to develop the relationships between the relevant factors. So far, the two research approaches have been used separately, while by combining and kneading these two widely used methods, an integrated method can be emerged so that will bring special advantages to research methodology. The main objective of this paper is to extend the GT integrating it with ISM. Concurring with the foremost objective of this research, a qualitative approach was carried out. Relying on the capacity and practical experiences of the researcher in directing and leading qualitative researches, in particular hiring both methodologies, the initial spark for the integration of both methods took place. Then, this idea was discussed with key informants (e.g., professors, talents and professional experts) and its application, sophistication and advantages were assured. As well instructed, an algorithm was developed to explain the application and use of this novel research methodology in a simple manner. The study outlines an algorithm for integrating GT with ISM. This integration promotes the richness of research by providing more value to the finding and results. Presenting the outputs in structural molding visualizes the results and inter-relationships among the elements. This study substantiates a new approach to qualitative research methodology. The innovative research method is considered by integrating the two widely used methods in research methodology, GT and ISM. This nascent and an extended GT method added values, enhanced richness in data and results and upgraded research tools by enriching qualitative research methods.

References

  1. Charmaz, K. (2014)., Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis., 2nd Edition. SAGE Publications, LA, USA. pp. 1-416, ISBN: 978-0-85702-9140.
  2. Willig, C. (2021)., Introducing qualitative research in psychology, (4thed)., Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press, UK. PP.1-254, ISBN: 978-0-33524-8698.
  3. Sharma, G., Kulshreshtha, K. & Bajpai, N. (2022)., Getting over the issue of theoretical stagnation: an exploration and metamorphosis of grounded theory approach., Quality and Quantity, 56(2), 857-884.
  4. Koleva, P. (2023)., Critical analysis of grounded theory strategy in organisational and management research., Qualitative Research Journal, 23(3), 258-272.
  5. Walsh, I., & Rowe, F. (2023)., BIBGT: combining bibliometrics and grounded theory to conduct a literature review., European Journal of Information Systems, 32(4), 653-674.
  6. Creamer, E. G. (2021)., Advancing grounded theory with mixed methods., Routledge, London. Pp.: 1- 194. ISBN: 978-0-42905-7007.
  7. Clarke, A. E. (2021)., From grounded theory to situational analysis: What’s new? Why? How?., In Developing grounded theory (pp. 223-266). Routledge.
  8. Ab Rahman, A. F., Mahamod, Z., & Zainuddin, M. Z. (2022)., 47 Years of interpretive structural modelling (ISM) as a methodology: A worldwide view., International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(5), 1673-1689.
  9. Jayant, A., Azhar, M., & Singh, P. (2015)., Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach: a state of the art literature review., Int. J. Res. Mech. Eng. Technol, 5(1), 15-21.
  10. Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. K. (2023)., Families of Grounded Theory: A Theoretical Structure for Novel Researchers., Studies in Social Science & Humanities, 2(3), 56–65.
  11. Attri, R. (2017)., Interpretive structural modelling: a comprehensive literature review on applications., Int. J. Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 10(3/4), 258–331.
  12. Attri, R., Dev, N., & Sharma, V. (2013)., Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: an overview., Research journal of management sciences, 2319(2), 1171.
  13. Kumar, A., & Singh, D. V. (2019)., Overview of interpretive structural modeling., International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 4(05).
  14. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2019)., Research Methods for Business Students., 8th edition, Pearson Education Limited, New York. PP.: 1- 872. ISBN: 978-1-29220-8794.
  15. Hussein, M. E., Hirst, S., Salyers, V., & Osuji, J. (2014)., Using Grounded Theory as a Method of Inquiry: Advantages and Disadvantages., The Qualitative Report, 19(27), 1-15.
  16. Chong, C. H., & Yeo, K. J. (2015)., An overview of grounded theory design in educational research., Asian Social Science, 11(12), 258-268.