International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN. 

Environmental beneficiation of Kalmakyr Copper-Molybdenum ore by Pre-flotation Gold-Silver Gravity Recovery

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Engineering Communication, Tashkent University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • 2Department of Mining, Almalyk State Technical Institute, Almalyk, Uzbekistan
  • 3Department of Mining, Almalyk State Technical Institute, Almalyk, Uzbekistan

Int. Res. J. Environment Sci., Volume 15, Issue (4), Pages 66-74, October,22 (2026)

Abstract

Improving recovery of valuable metals before tailings generation is an important component of resource-efficient mineral processing. This study evaluates the environmental significance of pre-flotation gravity recovery from Kalmakyr copper-molybdenum ore, Uzbekistan, by comparing a laboratory 30-KS shaking table with an FLSmidth Knelson KC-MD3 centrifugal concentrator. The assessment combines metallurgical performance with screening indicators relevant to environmental management: concentrate mass pull, gold and silver recovery, metal upgrading, and preservation of copper in the downstream flotation feed. Grinding for 20 min produced 70.3% material finer than 0.074 mm. The best tested shaking-table condition, 110 min-1 at 10 mm amplitude, recovered 21.91% Au and 24.60% Ag into 1.20% of the feed mass and preserved 99.55% of Cu in the gravity tailings. The 65 G Knelson condition recovered 24.94% Au and 20.80% Ag into 0.92% of the feed mass while preserving 99.27% of Cu. Gold upgrade ratios were 18.3 for the shaking table and 27.1 for the Knelson concentrator; corresponding silver upgrade ratios were 20.5 and 22.6. Thus, a small pre-flotation concentrate captured approximately one-fifth to one-quarter of the gravity-responsive precious-metal inventory without substantial copper diversion. This result indicates a resource-conservation opportunity and a potential reduction of valuable-metal loading to final tailings. Because electricity, water, reagent consumption, and final flotation-tailings quality were not measured, the study presents an environmental screening rather than a complete life-cycle assessment.

References

  1. Marmiroli, B., Rigamonti, L., & Brito-Parada, P. R. (2022)., Life cycle assessment in mineral processing: A review of the role of flotation., The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 27, 62–81.
  2. Farjana, S. H., Huda, N., & Mahmud, M. A. P. (2019)., Life cycle analysis of copper-gold-lead-silver-zinc beneficiation process., Science of the Total Environment, 659, 41–52.
  3. Samadov, A. U. & Abdusamiyeva, L. N. (2026)., Analysis of the granulometric composition and distribution of metals by size fractions in the copper-molybdenum ore of the Kalmakyr deposit., Engineering and Economics, 8(Part I), 78–82.
  4. Tao, M., Nie, K., Zhao, R., Shi, Y. & Cao, W. (2022)., Environmental impact of mining and beneficiation of copper sulphate mine based on life cycle assessment., Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 87613–87627.
  5. Samadov, A. U. & Abdusamiyeva, L. N. (2026)., Evaluation of the liberation degree of minerals in Kalmakyr copper-molybdenum ores and substantiation of processing technology., Engineering and Economics, 8(Part I), 174–178.
  6. Beylot, A. & Villeneuve, J. (2017)., Accounting for the environmental impacts of sulfidic tailings storage in the life cycle assessment of copper production: A case study., Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 139–145.
  7. Norgate, T., & Haque, N. (2012)., Using life cycle assessment to evaluate some environmental impacts of gold production., Journal of Cleaner Production, 29–30, 53–63.
  8. Zhao, X., Xue, C., Chi, G.-X., Mo, X.-X., Nurtaev, B., & Zhang, G.-Z. (2017)., Zircon and molybdenite geochronology and geochemistry of the Kalmakyr porphyry Cu-Au deposit, Almalyk district, Uzbekistan: Implications for mineralization processes., Ore Geology Reviews, 86, 807–824.
  9. Falconer, A. (2003)., Gravity separation: Old technique/new methods., Physical Separation in Science and Engineering, 12(1), 31–48.
  10. Das, A. & Sarkar, B. (2018)., Advanced gravity concentration of fine particles: A review., Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 39(6), 359–394.
  11. Surimbayev, B., Bolotova, L., Akcil, A., Yessengarayev, Y., Khumarbekuly, Y., Kanaly, Y., & Akzharkenov, M. (2025)., Gravity concentration of gold-bearing ores and processing of concentrates: A review., Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 46(7), 726–750.
  12. Chen, Q., Yang, H.Y., Tong, L.L., Niu, H.Q., Zhang, F.S., & Chen, G.M. (2020)., Research and application of a Knelson concentrator: A review., Minerals Engineering, 152, 106339.
  13. Knelson, B. & Jones, R. (1994)., A new generation of Knelson concentrators: A totally secure system goes on line., Minerals Engineering, 7(2–3), 201–207.
  14. Ghaffari, A. & Farzanegan, A. (2017)., An investigation on laboratory Knelson concentrator separation performance: Part 1: Retained mass modelling., Minerals Engineering, 112, 57–67.
  15. Kokkılıc, O., Langlois, R., & Waters, K. E. (2015)., A design of experiments investigation into dry separation using a Knelson concentrator., Minerals Engineering, 72, 73–86.
  16. Zhou, M., Kokkılıc, O., Langlois, R., & Waters, K. E. (2016)., Size-by-size analysis of dry gravity separation using a 3-in., Knelson concentrator. Minerals Engineering, 91, 42–54.
  17. Koppalkar, S., Bouajila, A., Gagnon, C. & Noel, G. (2011)., Understanding the discrepancy between prediction and plant GRG recovery for improving the gold gravity performance., Minerals Engineering, 24(6), 559–564.
  18. McGrath, T. D. H., Staunton, W. P., & Eksteen, J. J. (2013)., Development of a laboratory test to characterise the behaviour of free gold for use in a combined flash flotation and gravity concentrator model., Minerals Engineering, 53, 276–285.
  19. Patchejieff, B., Gaidarjiev, St. & Lazarov, D. (1994)., Technical note: Opportunities for fine gold recovery from a copper flotation circuit using a Knelson concentrator., Minerals Engineering, 7(2–3), 405–409.