International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Stochastic model for estimation of Fecundability in between two successive Live births (Closed Birth Interval)

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of AEM, University of Swaziland, Luyengo M205, SWAZILAND

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 3, Issue (ISC-2013), Pages 9-11, (2014)


Fertility as the positive force is responsible for the growth of human population. The researchers have given priority to understanding of the determinants of fertility through statistical methodologies. The stochastic models play an important role in estimation and interpretation of the fertility parameters. In this paper, stochastic model on successive live births has been derived for the estimation of fecundability based on assumptions of human reproductive process, indirectly incorporating socio, bio-demographic factors, taboos and use of contraceptive practices. In this model to describe the variation in the length of ith order successive live births for female giving their (i+1)th birth in T years of married life after ith birth with the realistic assumption that all the females not exposed to the risk of conception immediately after post-partum amenorrhea (PPA) termination due to some factors or contraceptive practices. In this derived model, fecundability (λ) has been considered to be constant over the study period. The duration of time from the point of termination of PPA to the state of exposure has been taken as random variable which follows exponential distribution. The maximum likelihood estimation technique has been used for the estimation of parameter (λ) through derived model.


  1. Freedman R., Expected family size and family size value in West Germany, Population Studies, 13, 136 (1959)
  2. Lenski G., The religious factor, Anchor Books, Doubleday, New York, USA (1963)
  3. Goldberg D., Some observations on recent changes in American fertility based on sample survey data, Eugenics Quarterly, 14(4), 255 (1967)
  4. Gini C., Premieres researches sur la fecundabilite de la femme, proceedings of the International Mathematics Congress, Toronto, 889-892 (1924)
  5. Sheps M.C., pregnancy wastage as a factor in the analysis of fertility data, Demography,1, 111-118 (1964)
  6. Singh S.N., Some probability distributions utilized in human fertility, Seminar volume in statistics, BHU, Varanasi, India, 74 (1966)
  7. Bhattacharya B.N., Pandey C.M. and Singh K.K., Model for closed birth interval and some social factors, Janasankhya, 6(1), 57 (1988)
  8. Singh U., Fertility analysis through birth interval models, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India (1989)
  9. Singh A.S., Some analytical models for human fertility and their applications, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi, India (1992)
  10. Mturi A.J., The determinants of birth intervals among non contrcepting Tanzanin women, African Population Studies,12(2),(1997)
  11. Rama Rao S., John T. and Ian A., Correlates of inter birth intervals: Implications of optional birth spacing strategies in Mozambique, Population Council, 1-17 (2006)
  12. Singh S.N., Singh S.N. and Narendra R. K., Demographic and socio-economic determinants of birth interval dynamics in Manipur : A survival analysis, Journal of Health and Allied Sciences, 9(4),(2011)
  13. Yadav R.C., Kumar A. and Pratap M., Estimation of parity progression ratios from open and closed birth interval, Journal of Data Science,11, 607-621, (2013)
  14. Sheps M.C., Menken J.A., Ridley J.C. and Lingner J.W., Truncation effect in closed birth interval and open birth interval data, Journal of American Statistical Association,65, 678 (1970)