Research Journal of Recent Sciences _________________________________________________ ISSN 2277-2502 Vol. 1(7), 52-58, July (2012) Res.J.Recent Sci. International Science Congress Association 52 Groundwater Geochmistry Study Using GIS in and Around Vallanadu Hills, Tamilnadu, India Manimaran D. Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Department of Geology,V.O.Chidambaram College, Thoothukudi, INDIAAvailable online at: www.isca.in Received 18th April 2012, revised 23rd April 2012, accepted 25th April 2012Abstract Groundwater is an essential part of life. The potential of groundwater is depends upon the subsurface rock and soil conditions. The following study was mainly focused the quality of groundwater in hard rock areas in and around Vallanadu hill using GIS application. The 36 water samples were collected in the study area. The water sample quality parameters such as colour, taste, and odor, turbidity, Ec, P, Alkaline, Dissolved constituents of silica, iron, Ca, Mg, K, corbonate, bicarbonate, Cl, No3, TDS was used for the study. The corrosity and rich out technaie is used for further study. The quality of groundwater study is used irrigation purpose determined by the salinity and sodium hazards analysis. The Styfzand’s classification is used for brackish and saltwater in the study area. The WHO standards of parameters are a dominant play role for the groundwater quality study. Key words: Groundwater, GIS, geochemistry, major element, HYCH OUT, Vallanadu.Introduction Groundwater is an important source of water supply through out the world. The quantity and the suitability of groundwater for human consumption and for irrigation are determined by its physical, chemical and bacteriological properties. Rain water, which is pure in nature, which falls on the ground, dissolves the soluble minerals, and the quality of water deteriorates depending upon the nature of the formation and the time duration1-5. The utility of water for different purpose depends on various physical and chemical parameters. Water samples have been collected and tested in 36 areas located around Vallanadu area used in this study. The available groundwater extensively tapped through open wells and bore wells for drinking and agricultural purpose. The main objectives of this study are to classify the available ground water of areas around Vallanadu using its physical and chemical parameters and to identify the mechanism which controls the groundwater chemistry. Vallanadu is a major panchayat in the Tuticorin District of Tamilnadu. The study area is comprised of the toposheet no. 58H/13 and 58H/14 of 1: 50,000 scales published by the Survey of India in the year 1969. The size of the area is approximately 400 square Km. the precise location of the study area is between Latitude 8039’ – 8051’ and Longitude 77045’ and 77055’ (Figure.1). Vallanadu and the surrounding area are well connected with roads and majority of the roads are metalled and only few are unmetalled. Vallanadu lies about 30Km west of Tuticorin, which has both rail and Airbase connections. The district receives the rain under the influence of both southwest and northeast monsoons. The rainfall was gradually increases towards south, west and north and attains a maximum around Kayattar (722.5 mm) and Kovilpatti (734.8 mm) in the northwestern part. The district enjoys a hot tropical climate. The high relative humidity prevails through out the year between 60 and 75%. The annual mean minimum and maximum temperature are 23°C and 40°C respectively. Figure – 1 Location map of the study area Geology of the study area: Rocks of the Archaean age are extensively exposed in the various parts of the state. The sediments ranging in age from the Gondwanas to recent are Research Journal of Recent Sciences ______________________________________________________________ ISSN 2277-2502Vol. 1(7), 52-58, July (2012) Res. J. Recent Sci. International Science Congress Association 53 mostly confined to the eastern coast. The crystalline rocks exposed in this part of the peninsular shield include the rocks of the Charnockite group, the Khondalite group and gneisses and schists, traversed by ultramafic, basic, granite and syenite intrusives. About 90% of the district is made up of crystalline rocks of Proterozoic group comprising of Charnockites, Garnetiferous biotite gneiss, Quartzite etc., Karumalai and Vallanadu hillocks are structural features. Few inselbergs are seen in the plain. Pediments, rocky pediments, buried pediments and valley filles are the other landforms in the district. The Vallanadu area is a high grade metamorphic terrain of almandine amphibolite to granulite facies. The area is essentially comprised of different lithotypes i.e., quartzites, calc-silicate rocks, Khondalites, Composite gneisses, Cordierite gneiesses, charnockites, Grey granites and pink granites and veins of pyroxene granulites and amphibolites. Khondalites of vallanadu area of Kerala Khondalite Belt (KKB) are represented by pelitic, Semipelitic, psammitic and calcareous members. The distribution of various lithotypes of the area is shown in figure 2. Figure – 2 Geological Map of the study aeraMaterial and Methods Groundwater constitutes one portion of the hydrologic cycle as even it is to be regarded as the renewable resources6-8. Ground water occurrence in unconsolidated rocks strikingly different from that of in consolidated sediments. The lithology is one of the parameters that control the ground water quality and other factors include evaporation at the surface prior to infiltration, evapotranspiration and nature of aquifer and residence time. Behaviour of ground water in the Indian sub-continent is highly complicated due to the occurrence of diversified geological formations with considerable lithological and chronological variations, complex tectonic framework, climatological dissimilarities and various hydrochemical conditions. Broadly two groups of rock formations have been identified, depending on characteristically different hydraulics of ground water viz. porous formations and fissured formations. Groundwater potential and Scenario of the study area: The geology of the area is mainly composed of hard rocks and the fractured and well jointed nature of the rocks provide good amount of groundwater. Comparatively the gneissic rocks are with high groundwater potential owing to the weathering and fracturing for a considerable depth. Charnockites are low in water potential but well jointed, sheared Charnockites are good for groundwater potential. Quartzites are mostly granular, well jointed, cracked and fissured and these properties are reasons behind Groundwater potential of quartzites9,10. The open wells of the area vary in depth from 10 to 40 meters. The district is underlain by both porous and fissured formations. The important aquifer systems in the district are constituted by i) unconsolidated and semi-consolidated formations and ii) weathered and fractured crystalline rocks. The porous formations in the district include sandstones and clays of recent to sub-recent and tertiary age (quaternary). The recent formations comprising mainly sands, clays and gravels are confined to major drainage courses in the district. The maximum thickness of alluvium is 45.0m bgl; whereas the average thickness is about 25.0m. Ground water occurs under water table and confined conditions in these formations and is being developed by means of dug wells and filter points11,12. The productive zones are encountered in the depth range of 29.5 to 62m bgl. Alluvium, which forms a good aquifer system along the Tamirabarani, Vaippar and Gundar river bed which is one of the major sources of water supply to the villages. The water-bearing properties of crystalline formations which lack primary porosity depend on the extent of development of secondary intergranular porosity. The occurrence and movement of ground water in these rocks are under unconfined conditions in the joints and fissures and dependent on the nature and extent of pores and interconnection of fractures zones. The yield characteristics of wells vary considerably depending on the topographic set-up, lithology and nature of weathering. Hydrogeochemistry: Hydrogeochemistry of groundwater is a dynamic process, which undergoes a constant change with reference to time and space. The geochemical quality of groundwater is also related to the nature of host rock as well as the overlying rock types. Geochemical character of groundwater is an essential component of scientific management of existing groundwater resources. In the present day an attempt has been made to identify the suitability of existing groundwater with reference to drinking, domestic, industrial and irrigational needs. The quality of groundwater is an important as its quantity. All groundwater contains dissolved solids in solution that are derived from the location due to movement of the water. In order to carry out the objectives water samples are collected from different locations are Research Journal of Recent Sciences ______________________________________________________________ ISSN 2277-2502Vol. 1(7), 52-58, July (2012) Res. J. Recent Sci. International Science Congress Association 54 analysed to evaluate groundwater quality. The collection and testing of water samples is a very important operation in any water quality study. To analyse the groundwater quality, the groundwater should be collected in one liter capacity polythene bottles after rinsing the bottle with the water, which is to be sampled and the sample collected and sealed tightly. Sample should be collected from a well, only after it has been pumped for sometimes, otherwise non-representative samples of stagnant or contaminated water may be obtained. Water samples have been collected from the existing bore wells and open well sources in 36 locations of the study area. Water samples have been analysed for major cations such as Ca, Mg, Na, and K and anions – CO, HCO, SO4, Cl and TDS, pH etc. The statistical report of the analysed results is presented in table no. 2. Results and Discussion Numerous computer techniques and programs have been developed for water analysis and for performing geochemical calculations pertaining to groundwater figure 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10. Balasubrananian and Sastri have developed a computer program for hydrochemical analysis of groundwater in FORTRAN. Later, it was modified in basic language. The analysed results have been processed using HYCH program, which classifies groundwater hydro geochemically and quality assessment can be done at a faster rate without resorting to tedious manual graphical procedure. The analysed results which have classified the study of groundwater and all the results are given in table 3.Total Dissolved Solids: Total dissolved solids of the ground water12,13 existing intake following regions above 1000mg/l, namely Vallanadu south (Loc. no.1), Vallanadu north (Loc.no.2), Ariyakulam (Loc.no.3), Thiyagarayanagar (Loc.no.5), Kilpattam (Loc.no.10), Papayapuram (Loc.no.12), Melapalamadai (Loc.no.13), Sivalaperi (Loc.no.15), Maruvathalai (Loc.no.17&18), Savalaperi (Loc.no.19&20), Puliyampatti (Loc.no.21&22), Lakshmipuram (Loc.no.24&25), Akanayakkanpatti (Loc.no.28) and Kilpuvani (Loc.no.32), while in other areas TDS is below 1000 mg/l, such as KTC nagar (Loc.no.4), Rajagopalapuram (Loc.no.6), Muthur (Loc.no.7&), Thiruthu (Loc.no.9), Melpattam (Loc.no.11), Rajavallipuram (Loc.no.14), Sivalaperi (Loc.no.16), Puliyampatti (Loc.no.23), Akanayakkanpatti (Loc.no.26&27), Melpuvani (Loc.no.29,30&31), Kilpuvani (Loc.no.33), Singathakurichi (Loc.no.35) and Kasilingapuram (Loc.no.36), all above water indicate their suitable nature for drinking and domestic purposes. Groundwater Hardness: If the hardness is too low the water can be quite corrosive leaching copper and lead out of plumbing pipes. With very low hardness there would also be low levels of beneficial ions in the water, especially calcium and magnesium14-16. If hardness is too high it can have an unpleasant taste, can dry out skin and cause scaling on fixtures and throughout the water distribution system. This scaling is undesirable because it begins to decrease the efficiency of plumbing systems, which results in greater power consumption and increased costs. With reference to BIS, Indian Standards (IS 10500:1991) desirable limit up to 300 mg/l, permissible limit up to 600 mg/l. (table 1).Table-1 Groundwater hardness classification of the study area Hardness (mg/l) Water Class Sample location nos 0 – 75 Soft 6,7, 11,27, 30, 34, 35, 36 75 – 150 Moderately hard 8, 14, 16, 31, 33 150 – 300 Hard 9, 23, 29 �300 Very hard 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 32 Table–2 Chemical analysis of groundwater statistical report- Number of samples 36 Parameter Unit Min Max Average St. Dev. Dev. Coef Q25 Q50 Q75 Ca mg/l 43.349 498.362 199.5891 118.9854 59.61521 99.206 178.207 257.895 Mg mg/l 7.865 356.794 80.67145 66.76775 82.76503 31.99 66.15 106.2 Na mg/l 0.0 689.387 260.193 216.443 83.18555 64.17 184.762 426.205 K mg/l 0.0 150.968 36.3724 43.92311 120.7603 6.18 14.369 46.157 Cl mg/l 28.0 1205.0 313.9722 271.8278 86.57703 85.0 269.0 411.0 HCO3 mg/l 98.0 781.0 357.9445 140.9474 39.37689 268.0 342.0 415.0 CO3 mg/l 0.0 36.0 7.66667 10.79153 140.7591 0.0 0.0 12.0 NO3 mg/l 0.0 11.03 3.1725 2.84132 89.56078 1.17 2.92 4.42 SO4 mg/l 10.5 925.6 248.075 260.7145 105.095 46.3 138.8 373.0 TDS mg/l 150 4400 1385.556 1060.044 76.50681 580.0 970.0 1650.0 pH 6.7 8.7 7.46348 7.44841 99.79807 0.0 0.0 0.0 Research Journal of Recent Sciences ______________________________________________________________ ISSN 2277-2502Vol. 1(7), 52-58, July (2012) Res. J. Recent Sci. International Science Congress Association 55 Table-3 Results of HYCH out Loc. No. Location Name TDS CR Total Hardness USSL CLSSN. 1 Vallanadu south 1200 2.7887 633.6191 C3S1 2 Vallanadu north 1850 2.2733 318.2712 C4S2 3 Ariyakulam 1040 1.7948 314.5187 C3S1 4 KTC nagar 890 2.2886 424.7125 C3S1 5 Thiyagarayanagar 1080 1.6042 418.6169 C3S1 6 Rajagopalapuram 460 0.4411 39.20665 C3S1 7 Muthur 230 0.2290 31.09589 C2S1 8 Muthur 580 0.5066 122.5094 C3S1 9 Thiruthu 680 1.0182 218.8022 C3S1 10 Kilpattam 4400 2.9770 466.3212 C5S3 11 Melpattam 440 0.8601 32.99741 C2S1 12 Papayapuram 1600 3.1429 682.0701 C4S1 13 Melapalamadai 1070 1.2858 170.933 C3S1 14 Rajavallipuram 390 0.3517 138.1703 C2S1 15 Sivalaperi 3800 2.3786 1343.439 C5S2 16 Sivalaperi 150 0.5193 12.49368 C2S1 17 Maruvathalai 1580 2.6664 804.6872 C4S1 18 Maruvathalai 3100 2.8718 760.7316 C5S2 19 Savalaperi 2900 5.3700 1032.034 C5S2 20 Savalaperi 2900 3.1287 784.1268 C5S2 21 Puliyampatti 1970 2.8704 554.6245 C4S2 22 Puliyampatti 1900 1.3383 421.9371 C4S2 23 Puliyampatti 950 1.6765 178.2572 C3S1 24 Lakshmipuram 1470 4.5356 350.2631 C4S2 25 Lakshmipuram 3400 4.2632 957.0551 C5S2 26 Akanayakkanpatti 970 0.7762 23.0813 C3S1 27 Akanayakkanpatti 950 0.7849 51.52912 C3S1 28 Akanayakkanpatti 1630 4.1300 925.7409 C4S1 29 Melpuvani 780 1.3025 179.0112 C3S1 30 Melpuvani 910 1.2717 34.26414 C3S2 31 Melpuvani 740 0.9803 93.09199 C3S1 32 Kilpuvani 1650 2.7091 587.0051 C4S1 33 Kilpuvani 820 0.9248 67.7968 C3S1 34 Kilpuvani 550 0.4508 38.8835 C3S1 35 Singathakurichi 330 0.4506 20.52805 C2S1 36 Kasilingapuram 520 0.4544 11.49182 C3S1 Stuyfzand’s Classification of Groundwater: The following locations of the study areas fall under fresh-brackish water. They are, Rajagopalapuram (Loc.no.6), Muthur (Loc.no.7&8), Melpattam (Loc.no.11), Rajavallipuram (Loc.no.14), Sivalaperi (Loc.no.16), Akanayakkanpatti (Loc.no.26&27), Melpuvani (Loc.no.31), Kilpuvani (Loc.no.33&34) Singathakurichi (Loc.no.35), Kasilingapuram (Loc.no.36). The brackish water samples are Thiruthu (Loc.no.9), Savalaperi (Loc.no.19), Puliyampatti (Loc.no.23), Lakshmipuram (Loc.no.24), Melpuvani (Loc.no.29&30). Vallanadu south (Loc.no.1), Vallanadu north (Loc.no.2), Ariyakulam (Loc.no.3), KTC nagar (Loc.no.4), Thiyagarayanagar (Loc.no.5), Papayapuram (Loc.no.12), Melapalamadai (Loc.no.13), Maruvathalai (Loc.no.17&18), Savalaperi (Loc.no.20), Puliyampatti (Loc.no.21&22), Lakshmipuram (Loc.no.25), Akanayakkanpatti (Loc.no.28), Kilpuvani (Loc.no.32) are undr brackish –salt water. Kilpattam (Loc.no.10), Sivalaperi (Loc.no.15&16) are the salt water (figure 7). Salinity and Sodium Hazard: For diagnosis and classification, the total concentration of soluble salts (salinity hazard) in the irrigation water could be expressed in terms of specific conductance17,18. In terms of salinity hazards as low (C1), medium (C2), high (C3) and very high (C4) and also sodium hazards as low (S1), medium (S2), high (S3) and very high (S4). Most of the samples occur within C3-S1 (good water) category and it is suitable for irrigation purposes. USSL groundwater classification of the study area is given in the table no.8 and (figure 8 and table 4). Research Journal of Recent Sciences ______________________________________________________________ ISSN 2277-2502Vol. 1(7), 52-58, July (2012) Res. J. Recent Sci. International Science Congress Association 56 Table-4 Groundwater classification based on USSL Category Sample location no. C2S1 7, 11, 14, 16, 35 C3S1 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 29, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36 C4S1 12, 28 C3S2 23, 26, 27 C4S2 2, 17, 22, 24, 32 C4S3 21 Corrosivity Ratio: If the CR is less than 1, then the water is non-corrosive and if the CR is greater than 1, then the water is corrosive18,19 Rengarajan et al, used this methodology to identify the corrosive groundwater in Ramanathapuram district and Kodavanar basin respectively. The following locations of groundwater are fall under non-corrosive type of water, which can be easily transported through metal pipes. They are, Rajagopalapuram (Loc.no.6), Muthur (Loc.no.7&8), Melpattam (Loc.no.11), Rajavallipuram (Loc.no.14), Sivalaperi (Loc.no.16), Akanayakkanpatti (Loc.no.26&27), Melpuvani (Loc.no.31), Kilpuvani (Loc.no.33&34), Singathakurichi (Loc.no.35) and Kasilingapuram (Loc.no.36). The other locations of the study area are found to be corrosive water, it can only be transported through PVC pipes (figure 5). ConclusionThe thematic map for TDS, TH, pH, Corrosivity ratio, Stuyfzand’s, Wilcox are prepared and shown. The following conclusions are derived after the evaluation of hydrogeochemical investigation of groundwater in and around Vallanadu area. The TDS value is below the desirable limit occur in some pockets of area and it can be used for drinking and domestic purposes, most of the areas fall under above desirable limits. With reference to total hardness of the groundwater, hard and very hard water exist in this study area. Based on corrosivity ratio, the area is mostly occupying corrosive water, which can be transported through PVC pipes. With reference to salinity and sodium hazard most of the groundwater is suitable for irrigation. Based on Stuyfzand’s classification most of the area Brackish and brackish salt water occur. Based on BIS and WHO20,5 standards of TDS, TH, CR, USSL, EC and NO3 the study areas Rajagopalapuram (Loc.no.6), Muthur (Loc.no.7), Melpattam (Loc.no.11), Rajavallipuram (Loc.no.14), Sivalaperi (Loc.no.16), Singathakurichi (Loc.no.35) and Kasilingapuram (Loc.no.36) are good water for drinking, domestic and irrigation purposes. As per Gibbs value calculated by HYCH Out, most of the samples are rock interaction, indicating a longer residence time. Acknowledgement The author expresses his sincere thanks to Shri. A.P.C.V. Chockalingam, Secretary and Prof. Maragathasundaram, Principal, V.O.C. College, Tuticorin. The helps extended by Dr. G.Manimaran and Dr. A.Antony Ravindran, Professor, Department of Geology, V.O.Chidambaram College, Thoothukudi, India. References1.Caleb Adwangashi Tabwassah and Gabriel Ike Obiefun., Geophysical and Geotechnical Investigation of Cham Failed Dam Project, Ne Nigeria, Research Journal of Recent Sciences,1(2), 1-18 (2012) 2.Antony Ravindran A., Azimuthal Square Array Resistivity Method and Goundwater Exploration in Sanganoor, Coimbatore District, Tamilnadu, India, Research Journal of Recent Sciences,1(4), 41-45 (2012) 3.Mondal N.C., Singh, V.S., A new approach to delineate the groundwater recharge zone in hard rock terrain, Curr. Sci., 87(5), 658–662 (2004)4.Tijani M.N., Hydrogeochemical assessment of groundwater in Moro Area, Kwara State, Nigeria. Environ. Geol. 24 (3), 194–202. Turekian, K.K., 1977. Geochemical distribution of elements, fourth ed. Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 630 (1994)5.World Health Organization (WHO), Guideline of drinking quality. World Health Organization, Washington (1984)6.Zahid A., Balke, K.D., Hassan, M.Q., Flegr, M., Evaluation of aquifer environment under Hazaribagh leather processing zone of Dhaka city, Environ. Geol.,50(4), 495–504 (2006)7.Domenico P.A. and Schwartz F.W., Physical and chemical hydrogeology, John Willey and Sons, New York (1990)8.Freeze R.A. and Cherry J.A., Groundwater, Prentice Hall Inc., (1997) 9.Gibbs R.J., Mechanisms controlling world water chemistry. Science170, 1088–1090 (1970)10.Carrol A., Rain water as a chemical agent of ologic process –A review, U.S Geologicalsurvey water-supply, 97-104 (1962) 11.Karanth K.R., Groundwater Assessment Development and Management, Tata Mc Graw HillPublishing Company Ltd., 715 (1993)12.Ridchards C.A., Diagnosis and improvement of saline alkali soils, USDA handbook, 60, 160 (1954)13.Ryzner J.W., A new index for determining amount of calcium carbonate scale formed by water, J.Amer, W.W.Assn.,36, 472–486 (1944)14.Sawyer C.N., Chemistry for sanitoary engineers, and P.L. Mc CARTY 2nd., Mc Graw Hill,New York, 518 (1987)15.Stuyfzand P.J, A new hydro chemical Classification of water types, proc., IAHS 3, Science association, Baltimore, USA, 33-42 (1989) Research Journal of Recent Sciences ______________________________________________________________ ISSN 2277-2502Vol. 1(7), 52-58, July (2012) Res. J. Recent Sci. International Science Congress Association 57 16.Todd., Ground water hydrology, John Wiley, 535 (1980)17.Sastri J.C., Hydrogeochemistry of rocks of the basement complex of Karnataka state, J.Mysore university sec.B.V., 76, 20-33 (1974)18.Ayers R.S. and Westcot D.W., Water quality for Agriculture, Irrigation and Drainage, 29, Rev.1, FAQ, rome, 174 (1985)19.Rengarajan R. and Balasubramanian A., Corrosion and scale formation characteristics of groundwater in and around Nagavalli, Salem District, Tamil nadu, J.applied hydrology, 3(2), 15-22 (1990)20.Ryzner J.W., A new index for determining amount of carbonate scale formed by a water, J.Amer. W.W.Assn., 36,472-486 (1994) Figure - 3 Total dissolved solids of groundwater Figure - 4 Total hardness of groundwater Figure - 5 Corrisivity ratio of groundwater Figure - 6 Classification of irrigation waters Research Journal of Recent Sciences ______________________________________________________________ ISSN 2277-2502Vol. 1(7), 52-58, July (2012) Res. J. Recent Sci. International Science Congress Association 58 Figure - 7 Stuyfzand’s classification of groundwater Figure - 8 Sodium Absorption Ratio(SAR) Figure - 9 pH of Groundwater Figure - 10 NO 3 of the study area groundwater  Figure -11 Electrical conductance of groundwater