12th International Science Congress (ISC-2024) on 8th and 9th December 2024.  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN. 

In silico analyses of Rubisco Enzymes from different classes of Algae

Author Affiliations

  • 1The Virtual Institute of Bioinformatics, Department of Biosciences, Saurashtra University, Rajkot 360005, Gujarat, INDIA

Int. Res. J. Biological Sci., Volume 3, Issue (4), Pages 11-17, April,10 (2014)

Abstract

Rubisco (Ribulose 1, 5 Bisphosphate Carboxylase Oxygenase) is the most predominant enzyme of one of the few carbon assimilatory processes in nature i.e. Photosynthesis. The rbcL and rbcS genes code for the large and small subunits of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) respectively. In this study the rbcL protein sequences selected from various classes of algae were phylogenetically analyzed. Expasy’s Prot-param server and Cys_rec tool were used for physico-chemical and functional characterization of these proteins. For comparative structural analysis, experimental structures (X-ray and NMR) of rubisco proteins of representative species of Rhodophyta (Galderia sp. PDBID 1IWA) and Chlorophyta (Chlamydomonas sp. 1GK8) were used. Also, as no experimental structure of rubisco from any member of phaeophyta group is available, homology modeling approach was employed in order to derive structure of the same from Lessonia vadosa, a representative species of phaeophyta group. The validity of the modeled protein was further checked by RAMPAGE, Procheck, WHATIF, Errat, and Verify-3d servers. Studies of secondary structure of these proteins were carried out by the SSCP server. The in silico analysis, confirmed the close correlation between the rhodophyte and the phaeophyte rubico proteins at the functional level due to similarity in adaptability of the enzyme.

References

  1. Spreitzer R.J. and Salvucci M.E., Rubisco: structure, regulatory interactions, and possibilities for a better enzyme, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.53, 449–475 (2002)
  2. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M. and Kumar S., MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol., 28(10), 2731-2739 (2011)
  3. Wilkins M. R., Gasteiger E., Bairoch A., Sanchez J. C., Williams K. L., Appel R.D. and Hochstrasser D. F., Methods Mol. Biol.112, 531–552 (1999)
  4. Sugawara H., Yamamoto H., Shibata N., Inoue T., Okada S., Miyake C., Yokota A. and Kai Y., Crystal structure of carboxylase reaction-oriented ribulose 1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from a thermophilic red alga, Galdieria partita J Biol Chem, 274,15655-61 (1999)
  5. Taylor T. C., Backlund A., Bjorhall K., Spreitzer R. J. and Andersson, I., First crystal structure of Rubisco from a green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Biol Chem276(51), 48159-48164 (2001)
  6. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W. and Lipman, D. J., Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215(3), 403-410 (1990)
  7. Lambert C., Léonard N., De Bolle X. and Depiereux E., ESyPred3D: Prediction of proteins 3D structures, Bioinformatics18(9), 1250-1256 (2002)
  8. Laskowski R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. and Thornton J. M., PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 26(2), 283-291 (1993)
  9. Lovell S.C., Davis I.W., Arendall W.B., de Bakker P.I., Word J.M., Prisant M.G., Richardson J.S. and Richardson D.C., Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi, psi and Cbeta deviation, Proteins, 50, 437–450 (2003)
  10. Luthy R., Bowie J. U. and Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles, Nature, 356(6364), 83-85 (1992)
  11. Vriend G. WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program, J. Mol. Graphics, 8(1), 52-56 (1990)
  12. Colovos C. and Yeates T. O., Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions, Protein Sci.,2(9), 1511-1519 (1993)
  13. Castrignanò T., De Meo P. D. O., Cozzetto D., Talamo I. G. and Tramontano A. The PMDB protein model database. Nucleic Acids Res.,34(1), D306-D309 (2006)
  14. Eisenhaber F., Imperiale F., Argos P. and Frömmel C., Prediction of secondary structural content of proteins from their amino acid composition alone. I. New analytic vector decomposition methods. Proteins: Struct. Func. Bioinformatics, 25(2), 157-168 (1996)
  15. Maiti R., Van Domselaar G. H., Zhang H. and Wishart D. S., SuperPose: a simple server for sophisticated structural superposition, Nucleic Acids Res.,32(2), W590-W594 (2004)
  16. Sheth B.P. and Thaker V.S. rbcL: a key to C value paradox in plants, Plant Arch., 12(2), 915-919 (2012)
  17. Guruprasad K., Reddy B. B. and Pandit M. W., Correlation between stability of a protein and its dipeptide composition: a novel approach for predicting in vivo stability of a protein from its primary sequence, Protein Eng.,4(2), 155-161 (1990)
  18. Atsushi Ikai., Thermostability and aliphatic index of globular proteins, J. Biochem. 88(6), 1895-1898 (1980)
  19. Kyte J. and Doolittle R. F., A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol., 157(1), 105-132 (1982)
  20. Wang M., Kapralov M. and Anisimova M. Coevolution of amino acid residues in the key photosynthetic enzyme Rubisco. BMC Evol. Biol., 11(1), 266 (2011)