International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Assessment of total Soil organic carbon in Teak Ecosystem in Humid tropics using CENTURY model

Author Affiliations

  • 1Academy of Climate Change Education and Research, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur- 680654, Kerala, INDIA
  • 2College of Horticulture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala, INDIA

Res. J. Agriculture & Forestry Sci., Volume 4, Issue (1), Pages 20-24, January,8 (2016)


A study on assessment of total soil organic carbon in teak ecosystem in humid tropics was done using a soil carbon model, CENTURY. The objectives of the study included the evaluation of suitability of this model in teak ecosystems and to analyse the of total soil organic carbon simulated by this model. The study was conducted based on secondary data sets collected from the experiments done in teak plantations of Thrissur district. The other data sets related to soil parameters were collected from various resources of Kerala Agricultural University and Kerala Forest Research Institute. Soils in natural forest were used as a baseline to compare the soil in teak plantations. Hence any variation in soil conditions can be considered as a result of various management operations carried out on these natural forests and based on 1965 to 2050 year time sequence, it was reconstructed. The net primary productivity prediction by the model was taken as an accuracy index for other model outputs represented at those sites. The simulated carbon values were compared with the carbon baseline data obtained from different aged teak plantations. For CENTURY model, site data, site specific parameters, Event.100 file and schedule files were used. Hence it was concluded that for simulation of soil organic carbon, CENTURY model was efficient and it predicted a declining trend of total soil organic carbon. The model efficiency of CENTURY models for teak ecosystem was 0.88.


  1. Lal R. (2004)., Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security, Science, 30(4),1623–1627.
  2. Lal R. (2001)., Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect., Soil Science Society Americanspecial publication Madison, WI, 236.
  3. Berg B., Mc Claughty C. and Johanson M.B. (1992), Litter Mass loss rates in late stages of decomposition at some climatically and nutritionally different pine sites: A study on the effects of climate change, Dept. of forest ecology and forest soils, Swedish University ofAgricultural Sciences, Swedon, Report 67.
  4. Reeves D.W. (1997)., The role of soil organic matter in maintating soil quality in continuous cropping systems, . Soil and tillage Research, 4(3), 131-167
  5. Lemma B., Kleja D., Olsson B. and Nilsson M. (2007)., Factors controlling soil organic carbon sequestration under exotic tree plantations: A case study using the CO2Fix model in southwestern Ethiopia, Forest Ecology and Mangement. 252(13), 124-131.
  6. Nagesh and Prabhu. (2003)., Teak in Kerala state, India: Past, Present and Future., In: Quality Timber Products of Teak from sustainable Forest Management. Proceedings of the international conference on quality timber products of teak from sustainable forest management. Bhat K.M.,Nair K.V., Bhat E.M., Muralidharan E.M. and Sharma J.K.(eds.).Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi. 1-18.
  7. Jayaraman K., Bhat K.V., Rugmini P. and Anitha V.(2010)., Kerala Forest Research Institute, Teak netBulletin, Peechi, Thrissur, Kerala. India, 3, 2.
  8. Thomas P.T., Rugmini P. and Balagopalan M. (2013)., Carbon storage potential of different age teak plantations of Kerala, . KFRI, 20-28.
  9. Manjunatha M. (2015)., Modeling carbon dynamics in teak plantations of Kerala, Ph D (Forestry) thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, 137.
  10. Parton W.J., Schimel D.S., Cole C.V. and Ojima D.S.(1987)., Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands, . Soil Science Society Americal Journal 51(3) 1173-1179.
  11. Sanford R.L. Jr., W.J. Parton, D.S. Ojima and D.J. Lodge (1991)., Hurricane effects on soil organic matter dynamics and forest production in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico: Results of Simulation Modeling. Biotropica. 2(3), 364-372.
  12. Paustian K., Elliot E.T., Peterson G.A. and Killion K.(1996). Modeling climate, CO2 and management impacts on soil carbon in semi arid agroecosystem, Plant andsoil, 18(7), 351-365.
  13. Carvalho Leite L.F., Sa mendonça E., Ameida machado P.L.O., Fernandes Filho E.I. and Lima Neves J.C. (2004)., Simulating trends in soil organic carbon of an Acrisol under no-tillage and disc-plow systems using the CENTURY model., Geoderma, 21(2), 283-295.
  14. Kadambi K. (1992)., Silviculture and management of Teak. Austin state University, Bulletin 24, Wacogdoches, Texas. 137.
  15. Mapa R.B. (1995)., Effect of reforestation using Tectona grandis on infiltration and soil water retention., Forest, Ecology and Management, 7(7), 119-125.
  16. Vukicevic E. and Milosevic R. (1960)., Dynamics of the vegetation and microbe population on some forest fire areas, Sumarstvo, 13 295-306.
  17. Probert M.E., Keating B.A., Thompson J.P. and Parton W.J. (1995), Modeling water, nitrogen and crop yield for a long term fallow management experiment, Aust. J. Exp.Agric, 35 941-950.
  18. Smith P., Smith J.U., Pawlson D.S., McGill W.B., Arah J.R.M., Chertov O.G., Coleman K., Frmko U., Frolking S., Jekinsan L.S., Kelly R.H., Klein-Gunneweik H.,Komam A.S., Li C., Molina J.A.E., Mueller T., Parton W.J., Thornley J.H.M. and Whitmore A.P. (1997), A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long term experiments., Geoderma. 14(5) 113-222.
  19. Yongqiang Z., Tang Y., Jie J. and Yang Y. (2007)., Characterizing the dynamics of soil organic crabon in grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau., Science ibn china Series D., Earth Science, 50, 113-20.