International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Biosafety Concerns and Regulatory Framework for Transgenics

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar- 263145, INDIA
  • 2Institute of Biotechnology, ANGRAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030, INDIA
  • 3Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar- 263145, INDIA
  • 4Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar- 263145, INDIA
  • 5Division of Genetics, IARI, New Delhi- 110012, INDIA
  • 6Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar- 263145, INDIA

Res. J. Agriculture & Forestry Sci., Volume 2, Issue (3), Pages 7-13, March,8 (2014)


The executive environmental release and cultivation of transgenic crop varieties have aroused tremendous safety concerns such as risk to human health, risk to environment, risk to ecology and socioeconomic concerns. Issue regarding human health, toxicity, allergenicity, development of antibiotic resistance, eating foreign DNA etc. are global debate. Development of antibiotic resistance and eating foreign DNA are merely apprehensions and has no scientific basis. Among the environmental biosafety issue, transgene escape from a transgenic crop variety to its nontransgenic counterpart or wild relatives has aroused tremendous debates worldwide. Public acceptance is one of the major hurdles for adaptation of first wave of products of agricultural biotechnology. The role of credible experts in communicating the issue to the public in a realistic and effective manner is mandatory to make the difference. Comprehensive regulatory mechanisms have been evolved for development of Genetically Modified Organisms and rDNA research work by the regulatory authorities.


  1. Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council ofthe National Academies, Safety of Genetically EngineeredFoods: Approaches to Assessing Unintended HealthEffects, National Academies Press, (2004)
  2. Robinson J., Ethics and transgenic crops: a review, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 2, 72-81 (1999)
  3. Jones S., The language of the genes. Flamingo, London,pp. 347 (1994)
  4. De Vries H., The law of separation of characters incrosses, Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society, 25,243-248 (1900)
  5. Forster B.P., Lee M.A., Lundqvist U., Millam S., VamlingK. and Wilson T.M.A., Genetic engineering of crop plants:from genome to gene, Experimental Agriculture, 33, 15-33(1997)
  6. Mannion A. M. and Morse S., GM crops 1996-2012: areview of Agronomic,Environmental and Socio-economicimpacts, University of Reading Geographical Paper No.195, (2013)
  7. Benner S. A, and Sismour A. M., Synthetic biology.Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 533-543, (2005)
  8. Francis N., The status of Regulations for geneticallymodified crops in countries of Sub-Saharan Africa, African agricultural technology foundation, 2-21, (2006)
  9. Richmond C. L., Genetically modified crops in thePhilippines: Can existing biosafety regulations adequatelyprotect the environment?, Pacific rim law & policyjournal, 15, 569-598, (2006)
  10. Islam A. S. and Miah S. A., Transgenic plants: Risks,Concerns and Effects on Ecosystem and Human Health, Plant Tissue Cult. & Biotech, 16(2), 139-164, (2006)
  11. Malik V. S., Marker gene controversy in transgenic plants, Scientific Publishers, USA, pp. 65-90, (1999)
  12. Skerritt J. H., Genetically modified plants: developingcountries and the public acceptance debate, AgBiotechNet,2, ABN040 (2000)
  13. Shrivastava U. P., Transgenic plants: review on risks andbenefits in the environment of developing countries, Academic Voices, 1,(1), 84-93 (2011)
  14. James C., Global review of commercialized transgeniccrops: 2000, ISAAA Briefs,No. 2, (2001)
  15. Chopra P. and Kamma A., Genetically modified crops inIndia, The current status of GM crops in India., (2012)
  16. Purrington C.B., and Bergelson J., Assessing weediness oftrangenic crops: industry plays plant ecologist, TrendsEcol. Evol, 10, 340-342, (1995)
  17. Pretty J., Sustainable farming will put food on all ourtables, Guardian Weekly, pp. 26, (1999)
  18. Hubbell B.J. and Welsh R., Transgenic crops: engineeringa more sustainable agriculture?, Agriculture and HumanValues, 15, 43-56 (1998)
  19. Levidow L. and Carr S., How biotechnology regulationsets a risk/ethics boundary, Agriculture and HumanValues, 14, 29-43 (1997)
  20. Rifkin J., The biotech century, Victor Gollanz, London,pp.272 (1998)
  21. Dixon B., Genetic seeds of hope or despair. The case for, Guardian Weekly, p. 15, (1998)
  22. Shiva V., Genetic seeds of hope or despair. The caseagainst, Guardian Weekly. p. 15, (1998)
  23. Heinemann J., A typology of the effects of (trans) geneflow on the conservation and sustainable use of geneticresources, Background study paper No. 35, FAO, Rome, P.100, (2007)
  24. Healy M. P., Information Based Regulation andInternational Trade in Genetically Modified AgriculturalProducts: An Evaluation of the Cartagena Protocol onBiosafety, Wash. U. J.L. & Políy , 9(205), 210-12 (2002)
  25. Scheffler J.A., Parkinson R. and Dale P.J., Evaluating theeffectiveness of isolation distances for field plots ofoilseed rape (Brassica napus) using a herbicide-resistancetransgene as a selectable marker, Plant Breeding 114, 317Ė321 (1995)
  26. ELLSTRAND, supra note 9, at 172
  27. Gupta K., Karihaloo J.L. and Khetarpal R.K., BiosafetyRegulations of Asia-Pacific Countries, Asia-PacificAssociation of Agricultural Research Institutions,Bangkok; Asia-Pacific Consortium on AgriculturalBiotechnology, New Delhi and Food and AgriculturalOrganization of the United Nations, Rome, P. 108 (2008)
  28. National Research Council, supra note 34, at 49 (2006)
  29. Soleri D., Cleveland D.A and Cuevas F. A., Transgeniccrops and crop varietal diversity: the case of maize inMexico, Bioscience, 56, 503-513 (2006)
  30. Healy, supra note 35, at 211-212 (2006)
  31. ALTIERI, supra note 2, at 36 (2006)
  32. Deni J., B. Message, M., Chioccioli, D. and Tepfer., Unsuccessful search for DNA transfer from transgenicplants to bacteria in the intestine of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, Transgenic Research, 14, 207-215(2005)
  33. Bergthorsson U., Adams K. L., B., Thomason and PalmerJ. D., Widespread horizontal transfer of mitochondrialgenes in flowering plants, Nature, 424, 197-201 (2003)
  34. Thomson J.A.,, Horizontal transfer of DNA from GM cropsto bacteria and to mammalian cells, Journal of FoodScience, 66, 188-193 (2001)
  35. Celis C, Scurrah M., Cowgill S., Chumbiauca J., Green J.,Franco G., Main D., Kiezebrink R.G.F., Visser H.J.,Atkinson., Environmental biosafety and transgenic potatoin a centre of diversity for this crop, Nature, 432, 222-225(2004)
  36. Macdonald P., Developing Workable RegulatoryFrameworks for the Environmental Release of TransgenicPlants, Collection of Biosafety Reviews, 6, 126-159 (2012)
  37. McCord, supra note 14, (2006)
  38. Gay P. and Gillespe S., Antibiotic resistance markers inGM plants not a risk to human health, Published in LancetInfectiousdiseases - GM - plants Review (2005)
  39. Hamilton N., Legal Issues Shaping Society, Drake Journal of Agricultural Law, Spring, (2001)
  40. Kruft D., Impacts of Genetically-Modified Crops andSeeds on Farmers, The Agricultural Law Resource andReference Center, (2001)
  41. Angharad M.R., Gatehouse., Ferry N. and Romaan J.M.R., The case of the monarch butterfly: a verdict is returned, Trends in Genetics, 18 (5), 249-251(2002)
  42. Lusser M., Parisi C., Plan D. and Rodriguez-Cerezo E., New plant breeding techniques : State-of-the-art andprospects for commercial development, JRC Scientific andTechnical Reports. Luxembourg, European Union, 1-220(2011)
  43. Schouten H.J., Krens F.A., Jacobsen E., Cisgenic plantsare similar to traditionally bred plants: internationalregulations for genetically modified organisms should bealtered to exempt cisgenesis, EMBO Rep 7, 750-753(2006)
  44. Evaristo de Jesus K. R., Lanna A. C.,Vieira F. D., Luiz deAbreu A. and Ubeda de Lima D., A Proposed RiskAssessment Method for Genetically Modified Plants, Applied Biosafety, 11(3), 127-137 (2006)
  45. Mayer S., Letís keep the genie in its bottle, New Scientis,p.51(1996)
  46. Middendorf G. and. Busch L., Inquiry for the public good:Democratic participation in agricultural research, Agriculture and Human Values, 14, 45-57(1997)
  47. Hilbeck A., Baumgartner M., Fried P.M., and Bigler F., Effect of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed preyon mortality and development of immature Chrysoperlacarnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), EnvironmentalEntomology, 27, 1-8 (1998)
  48. Ruibal Mendieta N.L., Nagy A. M., Lints F.A., Thepotential allergenicity of novel foods, Journal of theScience of Food and Agriculture, 75, 405-411(1997)
  49. Nordlee J.A., Taylor S. L., Townsend J.A., Thomas L.A.and Bush R.K., Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen intransgenic soybeans, New England Journal of Medicine, 334, 688-692 (1996)
  50. Prescott V.E., Campbell P.M., Moore A., Mattes J.,Rothenberg M.E., Foster P.S., Higgins T.J.V. andHoganS.P., Transgenic expression of bean alpha-amylaseinhibitor in peas results in altered structure andimmunogenicity, Journal of Agricultural and FoodChemistry, 53, 9023-9030 (2005)
  51. APCoAB, Workshop on Biosafety Regulations forTransgenic Crops and the Need for harmonizing them inthe Asia-Pacific Region Ė Highlights andRecommendations, Asia-Pacific Consortium onAgricultural Biotechnology, New Delhi and InternationalCrop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, AndhraPradesh, 16+viii (2006)
  52. UNEP-GEF Biosafety Unit, A Comparative Analysis ofExperiences and Lessons from the UNEPGEF BiosafetyProjects, UNEP-GEF. 50, (2006)