International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Ethnoecology of Kaleka: Dayak's Agroforestry in Kapuas, Central Kalimantan Indonesia

Author Affiliations

  • 1Graduate School of Science and Environmental Technology, Brawijaya University, Jl. Veteran Malang, 65145, East Java, INDONESIA
  • 2Faculty of Agriculture, Brawijaya University, Jl. Veteran Malang, 65145, East Java, INDONESIA
  • 3Faculty of Agriculture, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarbaru, South Kalimantan, INDONESIA
  • 4Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Brawijaya University; and Graduate School of Science and Environmental Technology, Brawijaya University, Jl. Veteran Malang, 65145, East Java, INDONESIA

Res. J. Agriculture & Forestry Sci., Volume 1, Issue (8), Pages 5-12, September,8 (2013)


The aims of the research were to describe the socio-cultural aspect of Kaleka and its floristic diversity. The research was done in two villages in Central Kalimantan, namely, Dahian Tambuk and Tumbang Danau. This study confirms that Kaleka plays an important role in social, cultural and economical aspects of Dayak Kapuas. Plant resources in Kaleka are used and distributed by following two basic principles, namely, equality and sustainability. Local people's respect to their ancestors is implemented in maintaining and preserving Kaleka in good quality over generations. The philosophical aspect of local people in such villages contributes to Kaleka preservation in the modern era. Kaleka is habitat for many plant species, ranging from understory to upperstory. The species D. Zibethinus, A. heterophyllus, L. domesticum, C. nucifera, C. domestica, N. lappaceum, D. kutejensis, and A. catechu are the most important to local people's needs. Many species which are found in Kaleka are local and endemic to Kalimantan Island encompassing S. koetjape, M. casturi, D. kutejensis, B. motleyana and P. canescens. These fact shows that Kaleka is potential to be promoted as a key for biodiversity conservation in Central Kalimantan.


  1. Torquebiau E., Are tropical agroforestry home gardenssustainable? Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 41(2),189-207 (1992)
  2. McNeely J.A. and Schroth G., Agroforestry andbiodiversity conservation–traditional practices, presentdynamics, and lessons for the future, Biodiversity &Conservation, 15(2), 549-554 (2006)
  3. Harvey C.A., Komar O., Chazdon R., Ferguson B.G.,Finegan B., Griffith D.M.M., Martínez-ramos H., MoralesR., Nigh L., Soto-pinto M., Van Breugel and Wishnie M., Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversityconservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot, ConservationBiology, 22(1), 8-15 (2008)
  4. Thapa B., Sinclair F.L. and Walker D.H., Incorporation ofindigenous knowledge and perspectives in agroforestrydevelopment, In Agroforestry: Science, Policy and Practice(249-261), Springer Netherlands (1995)
  5. Michon G., Mary F and Bompard J.M., Multistoriedagroforestry garden system in West Sumatra, Indonesia,Agroforestry Systems, 4, 315-338 (1986)
  6. Wilkie P., Argent G., Cambell E. and Saridan A., Thediversity of 15 ha of lowland mixed dipterocarp forest, Central Kalimantan, Biodiversity & Conservation, 13(4),695-708 (2004)
  7. Jepson P., Momberg F. and van Noord H.V., A review ofthe efficacy of the protected area system of EastKalimantan Province, Indonesia, Natural Areas Journal,22(1), 28-42 (2002)
  8. Curran L.M., Trigg S.N., McDonald A.K., Astiani D.,Hardiono Y.M., Siregar P., Caniago I. and Kasischke E., Lowland forest loss in protected areas of IndonesianBorneo, Science, 303(5660), 1000-1003 (2004)
  9. Lontaan, Masyarakat Dayak Kalimantan, MonografPerpustakaan Kalimantan Tengah, Palangkaraya (1975)
  10. Mackinnon K., Mangalik A. and Hatta G., The Ecology ofKalimantan, The Ecology of Indonesia Series Vol II.Periplus
  11. Kabupaten Gunung Mas, , Statistik Kabupaten Gunung MasTahun 2012, Penerbit Badan Pusat Statistik KabupatenGunung Mas, Propinsi Kalimantan Tengah (2012)
  12. Tardío J. and Pardo-de-Santayana M., Cultural ImportanceIndices: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Useful WildPlants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain) 1, EconomicBotany, 62(1), 24-39 (2008)
  13. Byers B.A., Cunliffe R.N. and Hudak A.T., Linking theconservation of culture and nature: a case study of sacredforests in Zimbabwe, Human Ecology, 29(2), 187-218(2001)
  14. Colding J. and Folke C., Social taboos: “invisible” systemsof local resource management and biological conservation, Ecological Applications, 11(2), 584-600 (2001)
  15. Mgumia F.H. and Oba G., Potential role of sacred groves inbiodiversity conservation in Tanzania, EnvironmentalConservation, 30(3), 259-265 (2003)
  16. Bhagwat S.A. and Rutte C., Sacred groves: potential forbiodiversity management, Frontiers in Ecology and theEnvironment, 4(10), 519-524 (2006)
  17. Higgins-Zogib L., Dudley N., Mallarach J.M. andMansourian S., Beyond belief: Linking faiths and protectedareas to support biodiversity conservation, Arguments forProtected Areas: Multiple Benefits for Conservation andUse (2010)
  18. Cranbrook E. and Edwards D.S., Belalong: A TropicalRainforest, The Royal Geographic Society and Sun TreePublishing, Singapore (1994)
  19. Whitten T., Soeriaatmadja R.E. and Afif S.A., The Ecologyof Java and Bali, The Ecology of Indonesia Series Vol II.PEriplus, Singapore (1997)
  20. Monk K., de Fretes Y. and Reksodiharjo-lilley G., TheEcology of Nusa Tenggara and Maluku, The Ecology ofIndonesia Series Vol V. Periplus, Singapore (1997)
  21. Sodhi N.S., Koh L.P., Clements R., Wanger T.C., Hill J.K.,Hamer K.C., Clough Y., Tscharntke T., Posa M.R.C andLee T.M., Conserving Southeast Asian forest biodiversityin human-modified landscapes, Biological Conservation,143(10), 2375-2384 (2010)
  22. Lee J.S., Garcia-Ulloa J., and Koh L.P., Impacts of BiofuelExpansion in Biodiversity Hotspots, In BiodiversityHotspots (277-293) Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2011)
  23. Soegeng-Reksodihardjo W., The species of Durio withedible fruits, Economic Botany, 16(4), 270-282 (1962)
  24. Siregar M., Review: Species Diversity of Local Fruit Treesin Kalimantan: Problems of Conservation and ItsDevelopment, Biodiversitas, 7(1), 94-99 (2006)
  25. Mulyoutami E., Rismawan R. and Joshi L., Localknowledge and management of simpukng (forest gardens)among the Dayak people in East Kalimantan, Indonesia,Forest Ecology and Management, 257(10), 2054-2061(2009)
  26. Ginoga K., Cacho O., Erwidodo L.M. and Djaenudin D., Economic performance of common agroforestry systems insouthern Sumatra: implications for carbon sequestrationservices, Working paper ACIAR project ASEM (2002)
  27. Lim T.K., Durio kutejensis, In Edible Medicinal and NonMedicinalPlants (559-562), Springer Netherlands (2012)
  28. Elevitch C.E. and Manner H.I., Artocarpus heterophyllus(jackfruit), Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry(2006)
  29. Omar S., Zhang J., MacKinnon S.A., Leaman D., Durst T.,Philogene B.J.R., Arnason J.T., Sanchez-VindasP.E., Poveda L., Tamez P.A and Pezzuto J.M., Traditionally-used antimalarials from the Meliaceae, Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 3(2), 133-139 (2003)
  30. McNeely J.A. and Schroth G., Agroforestry andbiodiversity conservation–traditional practices, presentdynamics, and lessons for the future. Biodiversity &Conservation, 15(2), 549-554 (2006)
  31. Kaya M., Kammesheidt L. and Weidelt H.J., The forestgarden system of Saparua island Central Maluku, Indonesia, and its role in maintaining tree species diversity,Agroforestry Systems, 54(3), 225-234 (2002)
  32. Sardjono M.A., The lembo system: A model foragroforestry in dipterocarp forest ecosystems of EastKalimantan, Dipterocarp forest ecosystems: towardssustainable management. World Scientific, Singapore, 354-368 (1996)