International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

A Model for Suppliers' Assessment through fuzzy AHP Technique at Piece Making Firms

Author Affiliations

  • 1 Management Dept, Tabriz Branch, Islamic, Azad University, Tabriz, IRAN

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 3, Issue (9), Pages 1-9, September,2 (2014)


This research indicates a model for choosing the suppliers in IDEM factory. The statistical samples in criteria-selecting stage were 92 people who were selected spontaneously, and also there were 8 people of the senior managers from each part in the ranking stage. In the first step it was specified by Cronbach and in the second step by the inconsistency coefficient of reliability of the questionnaires. In the next step the criteria was specified by biniminal test calculations, and finally we paid to classify them by FAHP which according to the obtained results, the quality criterion with 0.135 weights has the most important. The green production criterion with 0.131 weights is in the second priority. The geographical location criterion with minimum weight (0.075) is in the last priority. For testing this model, five suppliers were ranked; so we have: the first ranking is for the fourth supplier with 0.332 weights. The fifth ranking is for the sixth supplier with 0.133 weights.


  1. Ghodsypour S.H. and Obrien C., The total cost of logestics in supplier selection , under conditions of multiple sourcing ,multiple criteria and capacity constraints, International journal of production economics, 15-27 (2001)
  2. Jaefarnejad A., Ajdari B. and Saleh M.R., Using data envelopment analysis and cross-efficient method for evaluating suppliers, engineering companies thoughtFarafan, Second National Conference on Performance Management (2007)
  3. Azadeh A., Ghaderi S.F., Javaheri Z. and Saberi M., A fuzzy mathematical programming approach to DEA models, Am. J. Applied Sci.,5, 1352-1357 (2008)
  4. Sawik T., Single vs. multiple objective supplier selection in a make to order environment, Omega, 38, 203-212 (2010)
  5. Kheljani J.G., Ghodsypour S.H. and O'Brien C., Optimizing whole supply chain benefit versus buyer's benefit through supplier selection, Int. J. Product. Econ.,121, 482-493 (2009)
  6. Lee A.H.I.,, A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks, Expert Syst. Appli.,36, 2879-2893 (2009)
  7. Yang J.L., Chiu H.N., Tzeng G.H. and Yeh R.H., Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships, Inform. Sci.,178, 4166-4183 (2008)
  8. Choi T.Y. and Hatly J.L., An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain, J. Oper. Manage.,14(4), 333-343 (1996)
  9. Oxenfeldt A., Cost Bene"t Analysis for Executive Decision Making: the Danger of Plain Common Sense, Amacon, New York (1979)
  10. Pinsoneault A. and Kraemer K.L., The e!ects on electronic meetings on group processes and outcomes: an assessment of the empirical research, European Journal of Operational Research, 46, 143-161 (1989)
  11. Ellram L.M., The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships, J. Purchas. Material Manage, 26(4), 8-12 (1990)
  12. Chaudhry S.S., Forst F.G. and Zydiak J.L., Vendor selection with price breaks, European Journal of Operational Research,70, 52}66 (1993)
  13. Rosenthal E.C., Zydiak J.L. and Chaudhry S.S., Vendor selection with bundling, Decision Sciences, 26(1), 35}48 (1995)
  14. Sadrian A.A. and Yoon Y.S., A procurement decision support system in business volume discount environments, Operations Research, 42(1), 14-23 (1994)
  15. Ganeshan R., Tyworth J.E. and Guo Y., Dual sourced supply chains: the discount supplier option, Transportation Research Part E, 35, 11-23 (1999)
  16. Weber C.A., Current J.R. and Benton W.C., Vendor selection criteria and methods, Eur. J. Oper. Res.,50(1), 2-18 (1991)
  17. Ghodsypour S.H. and O'Brin C., A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming, Int. J. Product. Econ.,56-57(1-3), 199-212 (1998)
  18. Dickson G.W., An analysis of vendor selection system and decisions, J. Purchas.,2(1), 28-41 (1966)
  19. Wang H.S., Configuration change assessment: Genetic optimization approach with fuzzy multiple criteria for part supplier selection decision, Expert Syst. Appl.,34(2), 1541-1555 (2008)
  20. Kahraman C., Cebeci U. and Ulukan Z., Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Inform, Manage, 16, 382-394 (2003)