International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Above-ground biomass and carbon stored by teak (Tectona grandis) in Gir National Park, Gujarat, India

    , ,

Author Affiliations

  • 1Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, 248001, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
  • 2Department of Wildlife Science, Aligarh Muslim University, 202002, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh (U.P.), India
  • 3Department of Wildlife Science, Aligarh Muslim University, 202002, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh (U.P.), India

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 13, Issue (1), Pages 15-19, January,2 (2024)

Abstract

Earth's most crucial greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide (CO2), a gas responsible for absorbing and emitting heat. An accurate characterization of above-ground biomass and tree carbon in tropical forest is important to estimate their contribution to Global Carbon stocks. A non-invasive method was used to estimate the carbon stored by the dominant tree species of Gir National Park and Sanctuary (GNPS) i.e., Teak. Circular plots of 10 x 10 m were laid in GNPS with a systemic random sampling to get the Girth at Breast Height (GBH) of the trees. An allometric equation with GBH as one of the independent variables was already developed for Teak and was used to estimate the total biomass and stored Carbon in present study. The result indicates that total dry biomass in National Park is 189.07 ± 6.7 kg per tree. The Carbon sequestered per tree is 94.5(±3.3) with 16.34 (±0.02) tonnes of carbon and 59.96 tonnes of CO2 per hectare. In case of Wildlife sanctuary, the total dry biomass was 202.42 kg (± 18.2) per tree. The carbon sequestered per tree is 101.21 kg (± 9.14) with 9.113 (± 0.02) tonnes of carbon and 33.44 tonnes of CO2 per hectare. It is the first study to estimate dry biomass and carbon stored by the tress in GNPS and the carbon storage vary among species so there is need to estimate carbon stored by other tree species in future. Carbon sequestration plays a vital role in addressing climate change. Considering the impact of climate change, a synergistic approach involving both bioenergy and carbon sequestration emerges as the most effective strategy for long-term mitigation of CO2 emissions.

References

  1. Vashum, K. T., & Jayakumar, S. (2012)., Methods to estimate above-ground biomass and carbon stock in natural forests-a review., Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography, 2(4), 1-7.
  2. Mohammadi, Z., Mohammadi Limaei, S., Lohmander, P., & Olsson, L. (2017)., Estimating the aboveground carbon sequestration and its economic value: case study: Iranian Caspian Forests., Journal of Forest Research, 63(11), 511-518.
  3. Lewis, S. L. (2006)., Tropical forests and the changing earth system., Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1465), 195-210.
  4. Malhi, Y., & Grace, J. (2000)., Tropical forests and atmospheric carbon dioxide., Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(8), 332-337.
  5. Brown, S. (1997)., Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer (Vol. 134)., Food & Agriculture Org..
  6. Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M. A., Chambers, J. Q., Eamus, D., ... & Yamakura, T. (2005)., Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests., Oecologia, 145, 87-99.
  7. Clark, D. A., Brown, S., Kicklighter, D. W., Chambers, J. Q., Thomlinson, J. R., Ni, J., & Holland, E. A. (2001)., Net primary production in tropical forests: an evaluation and synthesis of existing field data., Ecological applications, 11(2), 371-384.
  8. Mbow, C., Verstraete, M. M., Sambou, B., Diaw, A. T., & Neufeldt, H. (2014)., Allometric models for aboveground biomass in dry savanna trees of the Sudan and Sudan-Guinean ecosystems of Southern Senegal., Journal of Forest Research, 19(3), 340-347.
  9. Bayen, P., Bognounou, F., Lykke, A. M., Ouédraogo, M., & Thiombiano, A. (2016)., The use of biomass production and allometric models to estimate carbon sequestration of Jatropha curcas L. plantations in western Burkina Faso., Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18, 143-156.
  10. Clark, D. A., Brown, S., Kicklighter, D. W., Chambers, J. Q., Thomlinson, J. R., Ni, J., & Holland, E. A. (2001)., Net primary production in tropical forests: an evaluation and synthesis of existing field data., Ecological applications, 11(2), 371-384.
  11. Tinker, D., Stakes, G. K., & Arcano, R. M. (2010)., Allometric equation development, biomass, and aboveground productivity in Ponderosa pine forests, Black Hills, Wyoming., Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 25(3), 112-119.
  12. Jha, K. K. (2015)., Carbon storage and sequestration rate assessment and allometric model development in young teak plantations of tropical moist deciduous forest., India. J. For. Res. DOI 10.1007/s11676-015-0053-9
  13. Jain, A. and Ansari, S. A. (2013)., Quantification by allometric equations of carbon sequestered by Tectona grandis in different agroforestory systems., Journal of Forestry Research, 24(4), 699−702. DOI 10.1007/s11676-013-0406-1
  14. Khanduri, V.P.; Lalnundanga; Vanlalremkimi, J. (2008)., Growing stock variation in different teak (Tectona grandis) forest stands of Mizoram, India., Environmental Science- Journal of Forestry Research. DOI:10.1007/s11676-008-0043-2
  15. Becknell, J.M., Kucek, L.K. and Powers, J.S. (2012)., Aboveground biomass in mature and secondary seasonally dry tropical forests: A literature review and global synthesis., Forest Ecology and Management 276 (2012) 88–95
  16. Alam, M. S. (2010)., First record of Lesser False Vampire Bat (Magaderma spasma) in Gir National Park and Sanctuary., Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 107(2), 155-156.
  17. Meena, R. L., & Kumar, S. (2012)., Management plan for Gir protected areas., Gujarat Forest Department, Gujarat, India.
  18. Hernandez, S.G. and Sheehan, S.W. (2020)., Comparison of carbon sequestration efficacy between artificial photosynthetic carbon dioxide conversion and timberland reforestation., MRS Energy and Sustainability. doi:10.1557/mre.2020.32
  19. Othman, R., & Kasim, S. Z. A. (2016)., Assessment of plant materials carbon sequestration rate for horizontal and vertical landscape design., International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 7(6), 410.
  20. Ninan, K. N., & Inoue, M. (2014)., Valuing forest ecosystem services: Case study of a forest reserve in Japan., In Valuing Ecosystem Services (pp. 245-268). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  21. Melkania, N.P. (2009)., Carbon Sequestration in Indian Natural and Planted Forests., Indian Forester, 135(3), 380-387.
  22. Derwisch, S., Schwendenmann, L., Olschewski, R., Ho¨lscher, D. (2009)., Estimation and economic evaluation of aboveground carbon storage of Tectona grandis plantations in Western Panama., New Forests 37, 227–240. DOI 10.1007/s11056-008-9119-2
  23. Ravindranath, N.H. (1997)., Somasekhar BS, Gadgil M. Carbon ows in Indian forest., Climatic Change; 35(3), 297–320.
  24. Haripriya, G. S. (2000)., Estimates of biomass in Indian forests., Biomass and bioenergy, 19(4), 245-258.
  25. Chhabra, A., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2004)., Assessment of major pools and fluxes of carbon in Indian forests., Climatic Change, 64(3), 341-360.
  26. Manhas, R. K., Negi, J. D. S., Kumar, R., & Chauhan, P. S., (2006)., Temporal Assessment of Growing Stock, Biomass and Carbon Stock Of Indian Forests., Climatic Change, 74: 191–221 DOI: 10.1007/s10584-005-9011-4
  27. Kaul, M., Mohren, G. M. J., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2010)., Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India., Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 15:489–510 DOI 10.1007/s11027-010-9230-5
  28. Fang, S., Xue, J., & Tang, L. (2007)., Biomass production and carbon sequestration potential in poplar plantations with different management patterns., Journal of environmental management, 85(3), 672-679.
  29. Haripriya, G. S. (2002)., Biomass carbon of truncated diameter classes in Indian forests., Forest Ecology and Management, 168(1-3), 1-13.
  30. Lal, M., & Singh, R. (2000)., Carbon sequestration potential of Indian forests., Environmental monitoring and assessment, 60, 315-327.
  31. Atkinson, G., & Gundimeda, H. (2006)., Accounting for India, Ecological Economics, 59(4), 462–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2005.10.022
  32. FAO (2015)., The State of Food and Agriculture - Social protection and agriculture: breaking the cycle of rural poverty., http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4910e.pdf
  33. Brown, S., Gillespie, A. J., & Lugo, A. E. (1989)., Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data., Forest science, 35(4), 881-902.
  34. Kale, M., Singh, S., Roy, P. S., Deosthali, V., & Ghole, V. S. (2004)., Biomass equations of dominant species of dry deciduous forest in Shivpuri district, Madhya Pradesh., Current Science, 683-687.
  35. Keller, M., Palace, M., & Hurtt, G. (2001)., Biomass estimation in the Tapajos National Forest, Brazil: examination of sampling and allometric uncertainties., Forest Ecology and Management, 154(3), 371-382.