International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Ecological integrity of rivers, biondication and aquatic macroinvertebrates

Author Affiliations

  • 1Laboratory of Hydrobiolgy and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, 01 P. O Box: 526 Cotonou, Benin
  • 2Laboratory of Pluridisciplinary Researches of Technical Teaching, Normal High School of Technical Teaching of Lokossa, National University of Sciences, Technologies, Engineering and Mathematics of Abomey, P.O. Box 133 Lokossa, Cotonou, Benin
  • 3Laboratory of Hydrobiolgy and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, 01 P. O Box: 526 Cotonou, Benin
  • 4Laboratory of Hydrobiolgy and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, 01 P. O Box: 526 Cotonou, Benin
  • 5Laboratory of Hydrobiolgy and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, 01 P. O Box: 526 Cotonou, Benin
  • 6Laboratory of Hydrobiolgy and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, 01 P. O Box: 526 Cotonou, Benin

Int. Res. J. Environment Sci., Volume 11, Issue (3), Pages 35-40, July,22 (2022)

Abstract

The main objective is to clarify the concept of ecological integrity of rivers and explore the state of knowledge on the bioindication of ecological integrity based on macroinvertebrates.The work is based on a literature search and analysis of scientific publications, theses, dissertations and reports that deal with bioindication. According to this analysis, ecological integrity is schematised according to three main inseparable categories, namely chemical, physical and biological integrity, which define the general quality of an aquatic environment. Disturbance of the environment modifies each facies of this ecological integrity, which affects the structural and functional organisation of the organisms that reside there. The immediate response of populations to this environmental change evokes bioindication concept of aquatic ecosystems. Abiological response that justifies the use of bioindicators, including macroinvertebrates which are the most used.Effective monitoring of the ecological integrity of rivers involves the use of bioindicators that can reveal their ecological quality. Bioindicators are valuable tools that should be considered in aquatic ecosystem monitoring programs and environmental policies.

References

  1. Strayer, D.L. andDudgeon, D. (2010)., Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges., Journal of theNorth American Benthological Society,29, 344-358.
  2. Vörösmarty, C.J, McIntyre, P.B., Gessner, M.O, Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S.E., Sullivan, C.A., Reidy Liermann, C. and Davies, P.M. (2010)., Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity., Nature,467,553–561.
  3. Trichet-Arce E. (2013)., Interest of functional traits of macrobenthic communities in the dynamic diagnosis of biotic recovery of a watercourse following restoration actions., PhD thesis Ecotoxicology, Biodiversity, Ecosystems, University of Lorraine, 322p.
  4. AgblononHouelome, T.M., Adandedjan, D., Chikou, A., Lazar, I., Lazar, G. and Laleye, P. (2019)., Ecological quality of Alibori river (In northern Benin) based on macroinvertebrates community by multivariate statistical approach., Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies.
  5. Chouinard H. (2010)., The ecological integrity of watercourses: analysis of monitoring methods and proposal of a method adapted to the Ifrane National Park., Master
  6. Taylor, S.D., He, Y. and Hiscoc, M.K. (2016)., Modelling the impacts of agricultural management practices on river water quality in Eastern England., Journal of Environmental Management, 180, 147-163.
  7. Fonseca, A.R, Sanches Fernandes, L.F., Fontainhas-Fernandes, A., Monteiro, S.M.and Pacheco F.A.L. (2016)., From catchment to fish: Impact of anthropogenic pressures on gill histopathology., Scienceof the Total Environment, 550, 972-986.
  8. Gillis, P.L., McInnis, R., Salerno de Solla, J.R., Servos, M.R. and Leonard E.M. (2017)., Freshwater mussels in an urban watershed: Impacts of anthropogenic inputs and habitat alterations on populations., Science of the Total Environment, 574, 671-679.
  9. Touzin D. (2008)., Use of benthic macroinvertebrates to assess the degradation of river water quality in Quebec. Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences Laval University Canada., Thesis of Agricultural Engineer. 40p.
  10. Diomandé, D., Kpai, N.N., Kouadio, K.N., Da Costa, K.S. and Gourene, G. (2013)., Spatial Distribution And Structure Of Benthic Macroinvertebrates In An Artificial Reservoir: Taabo Lake (Ivory cost)., International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences,7(4), 1503-1514.
  11. Elias, D.J., Ijumba, N.J., Mgaya, D.Y. and Mamboya, FA. (2014)., Study on Freshwater Macro invertebrates of Some Tanzanian Rivers as a Basis for Developing Biomonitoring Index for Assessing Pollution in Tropical African., Regions Journal of Ecosystems, 2, 231-239.
  12. Karr JR. (1996)., Ecological integrity and Ecological health are not the same., Dans Engeneering within ecological constraints, P. Schulze, ed. (Washington: National Academy Press), 109 p.
  13. Norris, R.H. and Thoms, N.C. (1999)., What is river health?., Freshwater Biology, 41, 197-209.
  14. Carvalho, C., Barata, M., Pereira, F., Gaspar, M.B., da Fonseca L.C. and Pousao-Ferreira, P. (2006)., Distribution patterns of macrobenthicspecies in relation to organic enrichment within aquaculture earthernponds., Marine Polluion Bulletin, 52, 1573-1584.
  15. Angermeier, P.L. and Karr, JR. (1994)., Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives., Bioscience, 44, 690-697.
  16. Angermeier, P.L., Smogor, R.A. and Stauffer, J.R. (2000)., Regional frameworks and candidate metrics for assessing biotic integrity in mid-atlantic highland streams. Transactions of the American., Fisheries Society 129, 962-981.
  17. Makert, B.A., Breure, A.M. and Zeichmeister H.G. (2003)., Bioindicators and Biomonitors. Principles, concept et application., Vienne Elsevier. 997.
  18. Kaiser, J. (2001)., Bioindicatrors and biomarkers of environnemental pollutions and risk assessment., Harfort Sciences Publishers. 304.
  19. Rosenberg, D.M. (1998)., A National Aquatic Ecosystem Health Program for Canada: We should go against the flow., Bulletin of Entomological Society of Canada, 30(4), 144-152.
  20. Oertel, N. and Salánki, J. (2003)., Biomonitoring and Bioindicators in Aquatic Ecosystems., In: Ambasht RS, Ambasht NK (Eds.) Modern trends in applied aquatic ecology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 219-246.
  21. Markert, B., Wappelhorst, O., Weckert, V., Herpin, U., Siewers, U. and Friese, K. (1999)., The use of bioindicators for monitoring the heavy-metal status of the environment., Journal of Radioanalytical Nuclear Chemistry, 240(2), 425-429.
  22. Benoit-Chabeau, V. (2014)., Selection factors for bioindicators of aquatic ecosystem quality: Development of a decision support tool. Master, Center universitaire de formation enenvironnement et de développement durable. Université de Sherbrooke. 118p.
  23. Banaru, D. andPerez, T. (2010)., Bio-indicators-Biomarkers., Note de cours, Marseille, Université de Marseille, 15p. www.com.univ-mrs.fr
  24. Camargo, J.A., Alonso, A. and De la Puente, M. (2014)., Multimetric assessment of nutrient enrichment in impounded rivers based on benthic macroinvertebrates., Environmental Monitoring and Publishers, 96, 233-249.
  25. Fränzle, O. (2003)., Bioindicators and environmental stress assessment., Bioindicators and biomonitors: principles, concepts and applications, Zechmeister, edition Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. 84 pp.
  26. Dziock, F., Henle, K., Foeckler, F., Follner, K and Scholz, M. (2006)., Biological indicator systems in floodplains: a review., International Review of Hydrobiology, 91, 271–291.
  27. Polechová, J. andStorch, D.(2008)., Ecological Niche., Encyclopedie of ecology 2, 1088-1097
  28. Grinnell, J. (1917)., The niche-relationships of the California Thrasher., Auk 34, 427–433.
  29. Elton, C. (1927)., Animal ecology., London, UK: Sidgwick & Jackson.
  30. Hutchinson, G. E. (1957)., Concluding remarks. population studies: animal ecology and demography., In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantative Biology, 22, 415-427.
  31. Poff, L.N, Olden, J.D., Vieira, N.K.M., Finn, D.S., Simmons, M.P. and Kondratieff, B.C. (2006)., Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: Traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships., Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 25, 730-755.
  32. McGill, B.J., Enquist, B.J., Weiher, E. andWestoby, M. (2006)., Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits., Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2, 178-185.
  33. Ausset, A. (2013)., What is an ecological niche?., In suite 101, Ecology and biodiversity. http://suite 101.fr/article/quest-niche-ecological.
  34. Morin, S. (2006)., Bioindication of the effects of metal pollution on benthic diatom communities. In situ and experimental approaches., Doctoral thesis, University of Bordeaux I Sciences and Technologies, 303p.
  35. Laperche (2004)., Standardized crustaceans as bioindicators of river quality., Environment and Technology,2, 321-333.
  36. Callesen, I. (2016)., Biodiversity and ecosystem services in life cycle impact assessment-Inventory objects or impact categories?., Ecosystem Services, 22, 94-103.
  37. Corti, R. (2013)., River drainage: effects on invertebrate communities and the dynamics of particulate organic matter., PhD thesis, Claude Bernard University Lyon I, 326p.
  38. Fellman, J.B., Pettit, N.E., Kalic, J. andGrieson, P.F. (2013). Influence of floodplain biogeochemical linkages on aquatic foodweb structure along a gradient of stream size in a tropical catchment. Freshwater water, 10, 117-182., undefined, undefined
  39. Simon, T.P. (1999)., Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities., CRC Press, London.
  40. Juffe-Bignoli, D and Darwall, W.R.T. (2012)., Assessment of the Socio-Economic Value of Freshwater Species in North Africa., Gland, Switzerland and Malaga, Spain: IUCN. IV. 92p.
  41. Friberg, N., Bonada, N., Bradley, D.C., Dunbar, M.J., Edwards, F.K., Grey, J., Hayes, R.B., Hildrew, A.G., Lamouroux, N. and Trimmer, M. (2011)., Biomonitoring of human impacts in freshwater ecosystems: the good, the bad and the ugly., Advances in Ecological Research, 44, 1–68.
  42. Moisan, J. and Pelletier, L. (2011)., Sampling protocol for freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates in Quebec, shallow watercourses with soft substrate 2011., State of the Environment Monitoring Directorate, Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks, 39p.ISBN: 978-2-550-61166-0
  43. Wallace, J.B. and Webster, J.R. (1996)., The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function., Annual Review of Entomology, 41, 115-139.
  44. Covich, A.P., Palmer, M.A. and Crowl, T.D. (1999)., The role of benthic invertebrate species in freshwater ecosystems., BioScience 42: 119-127.
  45. Boissoneault, Y. (2006)., Ecological monitoring of rivers in Quebec: comparison of bioindicators based on invertebrates and benthic diatoms., Master
  46. Caquet, T. (2012)., Invertebrates for the bio-indication of watercourses: assessment and perspectives., 7th national technical day, Paris.