International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Learner Centric Innovative Teaching and Evaluation Practices: A pathway to sustain Quality

    , ,

Author Affiliations

  • 1Symbiosis Institute of Computer Studies and Research, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Model Colony, Pune, India
  • 2Department of Education (SPPU), Aadarsha Comprehensive College of Education and Research, Pune, India
  • 3Symbiosis Institute of Computer Studies and Research, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Model Colony, Pune, India

Res. J.Educational Sci., Volume 10, Issue (1), Pages 19-23, August,1 (2022)

Abstract

The recent times has been observing a process of innovation and restructuring in higher education. A change in the teaching-learning practices and evaluation of student outcome is of prime importance for new strategies to be developed. This research is conducted for finding out innovative teaching practices adopted by the teachers at higher education institutions for attainment of expected learning outcomes and sustain quality of higher education. This study also aims at proposing such innovative practices for inclusion in NAAC framework making it result oriented framework.

References

  1. Walington J A (2003)., Mentoring Preservice teachers – Demands of participation in a partnership of mutual benefit., Unicorn Online Refereed Article No 28 Australian College of Educators, Canberra.
  2. DeCarlo, N. J., & Sterett, W. K. (2018)., History of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. In Quality in higher education., Routledge. pp. 79-94.
  3. Dellana, S. A., & Hauser, R. D. (1999)., Toward defining the quality culture., Engineering Management Journal, 11(2), 11-15.
  4. Gandhi, M. (2013)., International initiatives in assessment of quality and accreditation in higher education., International Journal of Educational Planning & Administration, 3(2), 121-138.
  5. Hoban, G. F. (2004)., Seeking quality in teacher education design: A four-dimensional approach., Australian Journal of Education, 48(2), 117-133.
  6. Hénard, F., & Roseveare, D. (2012)., Fostering quality teaching in higher education: Policies and practices., An IMHE Guide for Higher Education Institutions, 1(1), 7-11.
  7. McDowell, L., & Sambell, K. (1999)., The experience of innovative assessment: student perspectives., Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches, 71-82.
  8. Conti T (2007)., A history and review of the European Quality Award Mode., The TQM Magazine 19(2), 112–128.
  9. Dellana, S. A., & Hauser, R. D. (1999)., Toward defining the quality culture., Engineering Management Journal, 11(2), 11-15.
  10. Gandhi, M. (2013)., International initiatives in assessment of quality and accreditation in higher education., International Journal of Educational Planning & Administration, 3(2), 121-138.
  11. Hoban G (2004)., Seeking Quality in Teacher Education Design: A Four Dimensional Approach., Australian Journal of Education, 48(2), 117–133.
  12. Ingvarson, L., Beavis, A., & Kleinhenz, E. (2007)., Factors affecting the impact of teacher education programmes on teacher preparedness: implications for accreditation policy., European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4), 351-381.
  13. Main, J. (1991)., Is the Baldrige overblown., Fortune, 124(1), 62-65.
  14. Prensky, M. (2005)., Engage me or enrage me: Educating today’s “Digital Native” learners., Keynote speech SETT.
  15. López-Navas, C. (2014)., Educación superior y TIC: conceptos y tendencias de cambio/Higher education and ITC: concepts and changing trends., Historia y Comunicación Social, 19, 227-239.
  16. Lister, M. (2015)., Gamification: The effect on student motivation and performance at the post-secondary level., Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 3(2).
  17. Doley, P. (2014)., Role of Assessment in Improving Quality in Higher Education., A Journal of Humanities & Social Science.
  18. Adam, S. (2006)., An introduction to learning outcomes.,
  19. Wolf, K. (2007)., Evaluating and enhancing outcomes assessment quality in higher education programs., Metropolitan Universities, 18(2), 42-56.
  20. Jisha, K. V. (2015)., The role of NAAC for quality assurance in higher education., Research in Arts & Education, 4(3).
  21. Menezes, P. H. B., Martins, H. C., & Oliveira, R. R. (2018)., The excellence Baldrige criteria in the effectiveness of higher education institutions management., BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 15, 47-67.
  22. Shin, J. C. (2018)., Quality assurance systems as a higher education policy tool in Korea: International convergence and local contexts., International Journal of Educational Development, 63, 52-58.
  23. Hecht, J. and Kahrens, M. (2021)., How does national culture affect the teaching style in higher education and what are the implications for the student experience?., Tert Educ Manag.
  24. Colina, F. E., & Blanco, G. L. (2021)., Accountability compliance, and student learning as competing rationales for assessment: a case study of us tuning in practice., Tertiary Education and Management, 27(2), 129-142.